| 000 | 016680000a22003250004500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GICUC | ||
| 008 | 070224s2007 ua a f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GICUC _beng _cEG-GICUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aEng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.05.Ph.D.2007.Ah.R | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aAhmed Salah ElDin Fouad | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRoss procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement shot and midterm results / _cAhmed Salah ElDin Fouad ; Supervised Mostafa Radwan , Mohamed Rady AbuElEzz , Walid Gamal AbuSenna |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aمقارنة بين تغيير الصمام الاورطى مستخدما الصمام الرئوى او الصمام الاورطى الصناعى |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bAhmed Salah ElDin Fouad , _c2007 |
||
| 300 |
_a160P : _bill ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (PH.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty Of Medicine - Department Of Cardiothoracic Surgery | ||
| 520 | _aIn our randomized cohort of young patients with aortic valve stenoses , the Ross procedure was superior to the mechanical prostheses with regard to hemodynamic performance However , this did not result in an accelerated left ventricular mass regression Clinical advantages like reduced valve - related complications and lesser myocardial strain will have to be proven in the long term | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aMechanical valves | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPulmonary autograft | |
| 653 | 4 | _aRoss procedure | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Rady AbuElEzz , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMostafa Radwan , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aWalid Gamal AbuSenna , _eSupervisor |
|
| 905 |
_aEnas _ecataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aMustafa _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c60311 _d60311 |
||