000			03030cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031709.0
008			170327s2015 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.09.08.M.Sc.2015.Ol.E
100	0		_aOla Mostafa Ali Ghoniem
245	1	0	_aEvaluation of the use of Nano bone graft as a regenerative technique in comparison to sub- gingival mechanical debridement in patients with vertical bony defects / _cOla Mostafa Ali Ghoniem ; Supervised Mona Darhous , Amira Maged Abdelazim
246	1	5	_aتقييم استخدام عظام النانو كأسلوب التجدد بالمقارنة مع التنضير الميكانيكية تحت اللثة في المرضى الذين يعانون من العيوب العظمية الرأسية
260			_aCairo : _bOla Mostafa Ali Ghoniem , _c2015
300			_a125 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology
520			_aAim of study the objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical & radiographic effects of using bone graft (Nano bone graft) as a regenerative technique in one side with vertical bone defect in comparison to sub-gingival mechanical debridement in the other side. Materials and methods: In a split-mouth study design, 10 patients having bilateral intra-bony periodontal defects with radiographic vertical bone loss and associated probing depth {u2265} 7mm. selected sites were randomly divided into two groups. In group I non-surgical periodontal therapy was done, in group ii, Modified Widman flap with application of Nano-bone graft was done. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 3-months and 6-month post-opertavely.Results:Both treatment groups showed a significant probing depth(PPD) reduction, clinical attachment gain, increase bone density 6-month after surgery compared with baseline, however, Nano-bone group showed more bone fill at 3 months when compared to nonsurgical group then it decrease to almost equal to nonsurgical group at the end of the study . Conclusion:the use of Sub-gingival debridement is more advisable than modified Widman flaps and Nano-bone application as it gives the same clinical outcome with less cost and less harm for the patient. Clinical recommendations: Further studies are needed with larger sample size and longer duration to detect the action of Nano-bone graft in the treatment of vertical bony defects in comparison to sub-gingival mechanical debridement
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aBone substitutes
653		4	_aNano bone graft
653		4	_aRegenerative techniques
700	0		_aAmira Maged Abdelazim , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMona Darhous , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShaima _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c60450 _d60450