000			02299cam a2200325 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
008			170529s2016 ua h f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.11.01.M.Sc.2016.Mo.C
100	0		_aMohey Elden Moez Elden Bassiony Salah Elden
245	1	0	_aComparative study between baska mask versus ambu aura laryngeal mask as a conduit for ventilation in low risk patients undergoing non-abdominal ambulatory surgery / _cMoheyelden Moezelden Bassiony Salahelden ; Supervised Ahmed Mounir Shash , Maha Mohammed Ismail Youssef , Sherin Refaat Mahmoud
246	1	5	_aدراسة مقارنة بين القناع الحنجرى الهوائى الباسكا و قناع الأمبو كقناع للتهويه أثناء اجراء العمليات الجراحية للمرضى منخفضى المخاطر فى غير منطقه البطن
260			_aCairo : _bMohey Elden Moez Elden Bassiony Salah Elden , _c2016
300			_a63 Leaves : _bfacsimiles ; _c30cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Anaesthesia
520			_aThis study was conducted in Kasr Alainy teaching Hospital, after obtaining approval from Kasr Alainy hospital research ethical committee, written informed consents were taken from 60 patients, all of whom completed this study. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups, 30 each, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria: GA (n=30) in which ambu auraGain was used for ventilation. GB (n=30) in which BASKA mask was used for ventilation. Our main result was that both the ambu auraGain and the baska mask provide an overall high airway seal pressure in the majority of adult patients. However, the baska mask proved to provide a better seal with the glottis aperture compared to ambu auraGain
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aMask as a conduir
653		4	_aMasr versus ambu aura laryngeal
653		4	_aStudy between baska
700	0		_aAhmed Mounir Shash , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMaha Mohammed Ismail Youssef , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSherin Refaat Mahmoud , _eSupervisor
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c61020 _d61020