000 02328cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031738.0
008 170701s2016 ua o f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2016.Am.E
100 0 _aAmr Mohamed Ali Elfiky
245 1 4 _aThe effect of using locator attachment to retain tooth implant supported partial over denture compared to ball and socket attachment :
_bRandomized clinical trial /
_cAmr Mohamed Ali Elfiky ; Supervised Amal Rekaby Taha , Ahmed Emad Fayyad
246 1 5 _aتأثير استخدام الوصلة الموضعيه لابقاء الاطقم الجزئيه المحموله على غرسات مقارنه بوصلة الكره و التجويف
260 _aCairo :
_bAmr Mohamed Ali Elfiky ,
_c2016
300 _a98 P. :
_bphotogrphas ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
520 _aThe present study was conducted on twenty two partially edentulous patients selected from the outpatient clinic of the Prosthetic department, of Faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo university. Patients were divided into two groups; each group received two implants in the distal extension area with ball attachments in one group and locator attachments in the other group. Both groups were then restored with implant retained mandibular partial over denture. Retention of the prosthesis in both group, was evaluated at the time of delivery of prosthesis and three months later using digital force gauge. The result of this study showed significant difference in the retention values between the prosthesis retained with ball and socket and that retained with locator in favor to the locator attachment where the retention value are much more higher in the prosthesis retained with locator
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aBall and socket attachment
653 4 _aLocator attachment
653 4 _aRetain tooth implant supported
700 0 _aAhmed Emad Fayyad ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAmal Rekaby Taha ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c61405
_d61405