000 03312cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031746.0
008 170725s2016 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.06.M.Sc.2016.Ah.A
100 0 _aAhmed Hussein Zaher Harara
245 1 0 _aAssessment of three-dimensional cephalometric counterparts{u2019} analysis for a group of Egyptian adults with average facial proportions :
_bObservational study /
_cAhmed Hussein Zaher Harara ; Supervised Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman , Amr Ragab Elbeialy
246 1 5 _aتأسيسٌ ثلاثيُّ الأبعادِ لتحليلِ النظائرِ في أشعاتِ الرأسِ ثلاثيةِ الأبعادِ لـمجموعةٍ من المصرييـنَ البالغينَ ذوي الأوجه متوسـطةِ الأبعاد :
_bدراسة مراقبة
260 _aCairo :
_bAhmed Hussein Zaher Harara ,
_c2016
300 _a156 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles , photographs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520 _aEstablish an individualized 3D Counterparts{u2019} cephalometric analysis for a sample of Egyptian adults having average occlusion and balanced facial proportions. Secondary outcome was to evaluate the fitness of DiPaolo{u2019}s equation on the same group.Materials and methods: A cross sectional observational study was performed on 37 Egyptian adult subjects (18-25 y) having balanced facial proportions and Angle`s class I molar & canine relationship. Using the i-CAT CBCT machine. The three-dimensional assessment was performed by Anatomage software. Sex differences for all measurements and the fitness of DiPaolo{u2019}s equation on the sample were tested statistically for significance.Results: The intra-observer, inter-observer reliability for landmarks showed high concordance with identical ICC and CCC. Concerning the length measurements and ratios, the maxillary basal length (52.2mm) was larger statistically in males and larger than that of the mandibular length (47 mm) by 5mm with (1.1) ratio. The length of the middle cranial base (40.5 mm) was combatable with that of the mandibular ramus width (39.7 mm). Regarding the height measurements and ratios, the ratios of (PTFH / ATFH) was 65% in males and 62% in females, the ratio (ALFH / ATFH) was 55% in males and 54% in females and the ratio (PLFH /ALFH) was 54% in males and 50% in females without statistical significant differences. The inter-orbital width (97.9 mm) was double the basal width of either bases or equal to their sum. Moreover, equals the sum of the anterior and posterior lower facial heights. As a secondary outcome, the DiPaolo{u2019}s equation was evaluated for fitness on the sample but it was failed statistically
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAverage facial proportions
653 4 _aEgyptian adults
653 4 _aThree-dimensional cephalometric counterparts{u2019} analysis
700 0 _aAmr Ragab Elbeialy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aSanaa Abouzeid Soliman ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aEnas
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c61659
_d61659