| 000 | 01662cam a2200301 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031751.0 | ||
| 008 | 170805s2014 ua d f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aGift | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.34.M.Sc.2014.Na.D | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aNancy Bouchra Hanna | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDeveloping performance measurement indicators for corporate social reponsibility programs in Egypt : _bA performance evaluation tool using the balanced scorecard / _cNancy Bouchra Hanna ; Supervised Raghda Elebrashi |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bNancy Bouchra Hanna , _c2014 |
||
| 300 |
_a256 Leaves : _bcharts ; _c30cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Garman University - Faculty of Postgraduate Studies and Scientific Research- Department of General Management | ||
| 520 | _aFor many decades, corporate social reponsibility was widely used by organiations as a tool to ther image and reputation (Porter and Kramer,2002). When appropriately linked to strategy (Galbreath, 2009), CSR could be a source of competitive advantage for firms (Galbreath, 2009 ; Gyves and O'Higgins, 2008) as it boosts different financial and non-financial indicators such as: sales, customer satisfaction, productivity and technologcal capabilities (Smith, 2007; Moir,2001; Galbreath,2010; Gallego-Alvarez et al.2011). | ||
| 653 | 4 | _a Technologcal capabilities | |
| 653 | 4 | _a The balanced scorecard | |
| 653 | 4 | _aCorporate social reponsibility | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aRaghda Elebrashi , _esupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c61812 _d61812 |
||