000			03053cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031813.0
008			170926s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2017.Me.E
100	0		_aMennat Allah Mohammed Abdellatif Mohammed
245	1	0	_aEffect of lumbar stabilization exercises versus kinesiotaping on chronic mechanical low back pain / _cMennat Allah Mohammed Abdellatif Mohammed ; Supervised Ragia Mohamed Kamel , Hassan Hussein Ahmed , Reham Hussein Diab
246	1	5	_aتأثير تمارين التثبيت القطنى مقابل الشريط اللاصق الكاينسيو على آلام أسفل الظهر الميكانيكية المزمنة
260			_aCairo : _bMennat Allah Mohammed Abdellatif Mohammed , _c2017
300			_a102 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: Low back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems in modern society. Lumbar stabilization exercise is a therapeutic technique that uses a progressive sequence of training in coordination, balance, endurance and strengthening. Kinesiotape is an adhesive tape (100%) cotton {uFB01}bers which provide support and protection to soft tissues and joints, to decrease swelling and pain after injury, prompting improvement of blood circulation and lymphatic fluids drainage in the taped area. Both decrease pain, increase range of motion and improve activities of daily living. Purpose: This study was conducted to compare effect of lumbar stabilization exercises and kinesiotape in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. Design of the Study: Thirty patients were divided randomly into two equal groups. Group A received lumbar stabilization exercises and infrared radiation and Group B received kinesiotape and infrared radiation. Method: Visual analogue scale was used to measure the pain intensity level and dual inclinometer was used to measure range of motion the lumbar spine. Results: There was a high significant decrease in pain level in both groups; group A was p{u02C2}0.0001 and group B was p{u02C2}0.0001. There was a high significant improvement in lumbar range of motion in both groups A and B. In group A; flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation probabilities{u2019} values were p{u02C2}0.0001. In group B; flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation probabilities{u2019} values were p{u02C2}0.0001
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aInfrared Radiation
653		4	_aKinesiotape
653		4	_aLumbar Stabilization exercises
700	0		_aHassan Hussein Ahmed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aRagia Mohamed Kame , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aReham Hussein Diab , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c62541 _d62541