000			02318cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031840.0
008			171112s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.11.25.Ph.D.2017.Ah.A
100	0		_aAhmed Saeed Hussein Alfeeshawy
245	1	0	_aArthroscopic assisted reinsertion of avulsed tibial spine using pull through suture method tied over screw / _cAhmed Saeed Hussein Alfeeshawy ; Supervised Abdelaziz Elsengergy , Ahmed Mahmoud , Ahmed Rizk
246	1	5	_aاعادة تثبيت النتوء الداخلى القصبى الأمامى عن طريق الخيوط الساحبة بمساعدة المنظار من خلال الربط على المسمار
260			_aCairo : _bAhmed Saeed Hussein Alfeeshawy , _c2017
300			_a83 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedic Surgery
520			_aSpine fractures. Type I injury describes a minimally displaced fragment. Type II injury involves anterior elevation of the fracture fragment, whereas type III and IV injuries demonstrate complete separation of the fragment from the tibia. Type IV injury includes a rotational component or comminution of the fragment as well⁽³⁾. Different lines of treatment are used for these fractures ranging from conservative (non-operative) treatment in the form of cylindrical cast or different immobilizers to arthroscopic or even open fixation by many types of fixation methods according to classification of injury and associated injuries⁽⁴⁾. Regardless of operative technique often residual laxity happened likely due to ACL stretching at the time of injury, it was reported more in nonsurgical treated patients and it rarely causes clinically significant instability
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aAvulsed tibial spine
653		4	_aPull through suture
653		4	_aSpine fractures
700	0		_aAbdelaziz Elsengergy , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aAhmed Mahmoud , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aAhmed Rizk , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c63410 _d63410