000 03594cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031843.0
008 171118s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2017.Om.T
100 0 _aOmar Mohamed Ali Mabrouk
245 1 0 _aTripollar radiofrquancy lipolysis, ultrasound cavitation, and combination therapy on abdominal adiposity /
_cOmar Mohamed Ali Mabrouk ; Supervised Mohamed Hussein Elgendy , Medhat Araby Khalil , Rabab Ali Mohamed
246 1 5 _aموجات راديو ثلاثية الأقطاب: الموجات فوق الصوتية التجويفية و الجمع بينهما على انسجه البطن الدهنيه
260 _aCairo :
_bOmar Mohamed Ali Mabrouk ,
_c2017
300 _a92 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520 _aBackground: Central obesity or increased intra abdominal fat is associated with a statistically higher risk of heart disease, hypertension, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus type 2. Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate and compare the effectiveness of tripollar radiofrequency lipolysis (RF), ultrasound (US) cavitation and their combination on abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness and waist circumference (WC) in patients with abdominal adiposity. Subjects: Thirty subjects suffering from localized fat deposits at the abdominal area with age ranged from 25-45 years old, BMI ranged from 30-35 kg/m2 assigned randomly into three equal groups: Group (A) consisted of 10 subjects with mean age and BMI were 38.7±6.63 years and 33.55±1.31 kg/m2 respectively. Group (B) consisted of 10 subjects with mean age and BMI were 34.3±7.76 years and 33.57±1.57kg/m2 respectively. Group (C) consisted of 10 subjects with mean age and BMI were 34.3±7.76 years and 32.99±3.73 kg/m2 respectively. Methods: Group (A) received US cavitation (AC 220 Volt. 40 KHz) twice weekly for 10 sessions. Group (B) received tripollar RF (AC 220 Volt .1MHZ. 50 Watts) twice weekly for 10 sessions. Group (C) received combination therapy (both tripollar RF and US cavitation) twice weekly for 10 sessions. Subjects in all groups were assessed using ultrasonography and tape measurement before treatment then after treatment after 10 sessions to measure subcutaneous fat thickness and WC. Results: Showed that there was statistical significant difference between pre and post treatment within each group (A, B and C) for abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness and WC. But there was a non-statistical significant difference between group A and group C; also, there was no statistical significant difference between group A and group B, while, there was a statistical significant difference between group B and group C in management of abdominal adiposity. Conclusion: Ultrasound cavitation, tripollar RF and their combination were effective methods for management of abdominal adiposity, but combination therapy and US cavitation were the most effective
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAbdominal adiposity
653 4 _aTripollar radiofrequency
653 4 _aUltrasound cavitation
700 0 _aMedhat Araby Khalil ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohamed Hussein Elgendy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aRabab Ali Mohamed ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c63525
_d63525