000			03259cam a2200325 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
008			171204s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2017.Mo.P
100	0		_aMohamed Elsayed Abdelkarem Ali
245	1	0	_aPositional release versus myofascial release technique in chronic low back dysfunction / _cMohamed Elsayed Abdelkarem Ali ; Supervised Wadida H. Abdelkader Elsayed , Hasan Huseen Ahmed , Rabab Ali Mohamed
246	1	5	_aتقنية الأنفراج الوضعى مقابل الانفراج الليفى فى الاختلال المزمن لوظيفة أسفل الظهر
260			_aCairo : _bMohamed Elsayed Abdelkarem Ali , _c2017
300			_a149 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: Chronic low back dysfunction (CLBD) has direct and great influence on psychological, physical and socioeconomic aspects of the person{u2019}s life. Myofascial release technique (MFR) is a therapeutic treatment that uses gentle pressure and stretching to facilitate the release of fascial restrictions caused by accidents, injury, stress, repetitive use, and traumatic or surgical scarring (PRT) Positional release therapy is a method of total body evaluation and treatment using tender points (TPs) and a position of comfort (POC) to resolve the associated dysfunction. PRT is an indirect (the body part moves away from the resistance barrier for example the direction of greatest ease) and passive method of treatment (the therapist performs all the movements without help from the patient). Purpose: this study was conducted to compare the effect of PRT, MFR and conventional physical therapy treatment on pain intensity level, spinal mobility and functional disabilities level in patients with CLBD. Also, to compare the effect among PRT, MFR and conventional physical therapy treatment on pain intensity level, spinal mobility and functional disabilities level in patients with CLBD. Methods: Forty two patients from both genders were diagnosed as CLBD, aged from 40 to 60 years. Assigned randomly into three groups, each group consisted of 14 patients with mean age, weight, height and BMI of control group A 51.21±6.98, 72.85±6.19, 171.57±5.95 and 24.86±3.030 respectively received conventional physical therapy program. Group B 49.35±7.36, 72.64±6.42, 171.57±5.95 and 24.78±3.064 received conventional physical therapy program and PRT. Group C 49.35±6.23, 72.28±6.99, 171.57±5.95, and 24.65±3.176 respectively received conventional physical therapy program and MFR technique. Sessions were conducted three days week every other day for 12 sessions
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aChronic low back dysfunction
653		4	_aMyofascial release technique
653		4	_aPositional release technique
700	0		_aHasan Huseen Ahmed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aRabab Ali Mohamed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aWadida Hassan Abdelkader Elsayed , _eSupervisor
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c63834 _d63834