000 02960cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031911.0
008 180108s2016 ua o f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.06.M.Sc.2016.Na.R
100 0 _aNashwa Abdelmohsen Mohamed Ahmed
245 1 0 _aReliability of different frankfurt reference planes for three dimensional cephalometric analysis :
_bAn observational study /
_cNashwa Abdelmohsen Mohamed Ahmed ; Supervised Sanaa Abou Zeid , Hany Salah Eldin Eid , Amr Elbeialy
246 1 5 _aاعتمادية مختلف محاور فرانكفورت الافقية كمرجعية فى تحليل اشعات قياس الرأس ثلاثية الأبعاد :
_bدراسة مراقبة
260 _aCairo :
_bNashwa Abdelmohsen Mohamed Ahmed ,
_c2016
300 _a103 P. :
_bphotographs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520 _aObjective: Was to compare the reliability of six Frankfurt Horizontal planes versus the true Horizontal plane in adults having normal occlusion and balanced facial profile. Material and methods: CBCT images were collected from thirty seven Egyptian adult subjects using the I-CAT CBCT machine and anatomage 5.3 software to generate 3D volumetric reconstructions (3D CBCT). The inter and intra-observer reliability was confirmed after identification of the 3D landmarks for randomly selected 10% of the sample by two observers using the correlation coefficient. A newly constructed coordinate reference system that depends on the true vertical was used for accurate measurements. Six different Frankfurt planes were constructed and were compared to the true Horizontal plane. Results: The intra-observer, inter-observer reliability for landmarks showed high concordance with identical ICC and CCC exceeding 0.751 and 0.78 respectively. All the Frankfurt constituting points showed high reproducibility with high correlation values varied from 0.776 to 0.999 in the intra-observer readings and exceeded 0.994 in the inter-observer readings. All proposed Frankfurt planes showed insignificant difference in their mean cant that varied from 0.7 to 1.2 to the true horizontal plane. All planes showed no statistical significant difference from True Horizontal plane (p >0.05) on their comparison with the true horizontal plane using McNamaras{u2019} analysis
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aFrankfurt reference planes
653 4 _aSix Frankfurt Horizontal planes
653 4 _aThree dimensional cephalometric
700 0 _aAmr Elbeialy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aHany Salah Eldin Eid ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aSanaa Abou Zeid ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c64453
_d64453