000			03078cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031918.0
008			180128s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2017.Ma.E
100	0		_aMarco Zakaria Lamey
245	1	4	_aThe effect of forearm rotation on strength of elbow muscles at different shoulder positions / _cMarco Zakaria Lamey ; Supervised Neveen Abdellatif Abdelraoof , Magda Gaid Sedhom
246	1	5	_aتأثير دوران الساعد على قوة عضلات مفصل المرفق فى الأوضاع المختلفة لمفصل الكتف
260			_aCairo : _bMarco Zakaria Lamey , _c2017
300			_a78 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aIntroduction: Elbow is a critical element for a functional upper extremity. The primary functions of the elbow are to position the hand in space, act as a fulcrum for the forearm, and allow for powerful grasping and fine motions of the hand and wrist. Loss of elbow function can cause significant disability and affect activities of daily living, work-related tasks, and recreational activities. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between anatomical zero handgrip and 90{u00B0} pronated hand grip positions on elbow muscle performance at 45{u00B0} and 80{u00B0} shoulder abduction. Subjects and Method: Eighty subjects (Males and Females), their age ranged from 20 to 30 years participated in this study, were classified randomly into four equal groups. Group I and Group II were tested at anatomical zero hand grip position with shoulder abduction 45{u00B0} and 80{u00B0} respectively. Group III and Group IV were tested at 90 degree pronated handgrip position with shoulder abduction 45{u00B0} and 80{u00B0}respectively.All the participants were assessed by using Biodex 3 to measure peak torque to body weight and the agonist antagonist ratio of elbow flexor and extensor muscles at angular velocity 60{u00B0} / second. Results: ANOVA test showed that there were no statistically significant differences between anatomical zero handgrip and 90{u00B0} pronated hand grip positions on elbow muscle performance at 45{u00B0} and 80{u00B0} shoulder abduction. Conclusion: There was no effect of the four positions on peak torque per body weight and agonist antagonist ratio of elbow flexors and extensors muscles so strengthening exercises of elbow flexors and extensors muscles can be performed from any position from these four positions
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aAnatomical zero handgrip
653		4	_aIsokinetic
653		4	_aPeak torque
700	0		_aMagda Gaid Sedhom , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNeveen Abdellatif Abdelraoof , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c64679 _d64679