000			02330cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031933.0
008			180224s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.19.04.M.Sc.2017.Mi.O
100	0		_aMina Saad Ebrahim
245	1	0	_aOncologic outcome toneoadjuvantchemoradiation for rectal cancer after surgery for patients with complete response / _cMina Saad Ebrahim ; Supervised Samey Ramzy Shehata , Hesham Abdelkader Elhossieny , Ahmed Abdellatif Mohammed
246	1	5	_aنتائج مابعد العلاج الكيميائي والإشعاعي قبل الجراحة: والاستئصال الجراحي لسرطان المستقيم بعد الاستجابة الكاملة للعلاج الكيميائي والإشعاعي
260			_aCairo : _bMina Saad Ebrahim , _c2017
300			_a108 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - National Cancer Institute - Department of oncology (surgical)
520			_aBackground: Sphincter-sparing approaches for lower rectal adenocarcinomas have evolved as preoperative (neoadjuvant) radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy have been utilized to promote tumor regression in an attempt to convert a planned APR to a sphincter-sparing surgical procedure. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of neoadjuvant treatment Methods: this study included patients with low rectal cancer who received neoadjuvantchemoradiation followed by restaging clinically and radiologically. then surgery. Post operative pathology was compared with the outcome of neoadjuvantchemoradiation as shown by radiology before surgery. Results : there is significant relation between post operative pathology and preoperative re-staging methods after neoadjuvant therapy
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aLow rectal cancer
653		4	_aNeoadjuvant chemoradiation
653		4	_aRestaging after neoadjuvant
700	0		_aAhmed Abdellatif Mohammed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aHesham Abdelkader Elhossieny , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSamey Ramzy Shehata , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c65130 _d65130