000 03199cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031943.0
008 180314s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2017.Ah.C
100 0 _aAhmed Assem Abdelrahim
245 1 0 _aCupping therapy versus interferential cupping therapy on mechanical low back pain /
_cAhmed Assem Abdelrahim ; Supervised Maher Ahmed Elkeblawy , Ahmed Salah Aldin Hassan , Hanaa Kenawy Ata
246 1 5 _aالعلاج بكؤوس الهواء مقابل العلاج بكؤوس الموجات المتداخلة على الم اسفل الظهر الميكانيكى
260 _aCairo :
_bAhmed Assem Abdelrahim ,
_c2017
300 _a125 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520 _aBackground: Mechanical low back pain is a health problem affecting social and physical performance. Purpose: to investigate the effect of cupping therapy versus interferential cupping therapy on mechanical low back pain. Subjects: Sixty mechanical low back pain patients aged from 20-35years of both sexes, randomly divided into three groups, selected from Sohag University Neurosurgery Department. Methods: group (A) (study group): twenty patients received cupping therapy in addition to traditional physical therapy. Group (B) (study group): Twenty patients received cupping therapy and interferential cupping therapy (IFT) in addition to traditional physical therapy.Group (C) (control group): twenty patients received traditional physical therapy. The treatment was applied for four weeks, three sessions per week. Pain was measured by McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), disability was measured by the roland morris disability questionnaire and ROM was measured by goniometer before and after the treatment. Results: Statistical analysis using 3{u00D7}2 mixed design MANOVA indicated that were a statistically significant decrease in pain, disability in group (B) than other groups with p-value equal (P=0.0001*, 0.0001* and P=0.0001*) respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in ROMs in group (B) than other groups with p-value equal (P=0.0001*, 0.0001* and P=0.0001*) respectively. Conclusion: Both Cupping therapy and interferential cupping therapy (IFT) can improve pain, disability and ROM when used for treating mechanical low back pain. However, the improvement acquired by cupping therapy and interferential cupping therapy in addition to traditional physical therapy is more indicating that it can be a more effective choice for treating mechanical low back pain
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aCupping therapy
653 4 _aInterferential cupping
653 4 _aMechanical low back pain
700 0 _aAhmed Salah Aldin Hassan ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aHanaa Kenawy Ata ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMaher Ahmed Elkeblawy ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c65442
_d65442