000 02761cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031944.0
008 180317s2012 ua o f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.13.M.Sc.2012.Ah.C
100 0 _aAhmed Elhage Mohamed Hamed
245 1 0 _aClinical evaluation of immediate functional and non-functional loaded implants /
_cAhmed Elhage Mohamed Hamed ; Supervised Mounier Ahmed Shaker , Kadry Osama Mohamed Nasr
246 1 5 _aتقييم سريرى للغرسات السنية الفوريه الوظيفية و الغير وظيفية التحميل
260 _aCairo :
_bAhmed Elhage Mohamed Hamed ,
_c2012
300 _a108 P. :
_bphotographs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
520 _aThe current study contained 12 spectra screw plant immediately inserted in healthy patient after extraction. At the same time provisional crowns were inserted in place to restore esthetic. All patients included in this study have no contra-indication for surgical intervention. Patients were instructed to take antibiotic (Amoxicillin 1 g every 12 hours) one day before implantation and 4 days after implantation procedure in order to mentain plasma antibiotic level high. The badly decayed teeth were extracted gently to preserve the alveolar bone with proper irrigation of extraction site, then implants were inserted in place with hydroxyapatite powder implants were prepared, impressions were taken and provisional crown cemented in place. The patients classified into two groups: First group provisional crown were held in contact with opposing teeth (immediate functional loading), while second group provisional crown were held out of contact (delayed functional loading). Evaluation of the implant was done using digital radiograph at 1,3 and 6 month post-operatively. In all cases complete bone formation around implant was reported for both groups. Two ways ANOVA reveals a significant increase in bone density for both groups. On the same time increase bone height also for both groups and this increase was significantly with the use of delayed functional loading compared with immediate functional loading
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aImmediate functional
653 4 _aImmediate functional loading
653 4 _aNon-functional loaded implants
700 0 _aKadry Osama Mohamed Nasr ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMounier Ahmed Shaker ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c65469
_d65469