000			03436cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032004.0
008			180509s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2017.Ra.T
100	0		_aRamy Raafat Mourad
245	1	0	_aThrust manipulation versus muscle energy technique on somatic dysfunction in mechanical low back pain patients / _cRamy Raafat Mourad ; Supervised Mohamed Hussien Elgendy , Ahmed Salah Eldin Hassan , Rania Nagy Karkousha
246	1	5	_aالتحريك المفاجئ مقابل تقنية الطاقة العضلية علي الاختلال الجسدي في مرضى آلام اسفل الظهر الميكانيكية
260			_aCairo : _bRamy Raafat Mourad , _c2017
300			_a105 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: Mechanical low back pain is pain of musculoskeletal origin in the posterior lumbar spine, sacrum, or paraspinal soft tissues, characterized by the presence of muscle spasm and decreased range of motion. Incidence of somatic dysfunctions in lumbar spine is more in patients with low back pain than those without low back pain Purpose: To compare short term effect of high velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation versus muscle energy technique on somatic dysfunction in mechanical low back pain patients in terms of pain, tenderness and range of motion. Design: pre-test post-test experimental study. Methods: 40 male patients with mechanical low back pain, their ages ranged from 20- 30 years. They were randomly assigned by using closed envelope method into two equal groups; group A (24±3.69 years and 24.6±3 kg/m2) received high velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation and group B (24.3±3.57 years and 24.7±2.1 kg/m2) received muscle energy technique. Visual analog scale, pressure algometer and back range of motion device were used to assess pain intensity, tenderness and range of motion respectively pre and post treatment. Results: The study revealed that there was significant decrease in pain and tenderness and increased range of motion (except for flexion) post treatment in both groups. While there was no significant difference in tenderness, flexion and extension range of motion between both groups post treatment, there was significant difference in pain, side bending and rotation range of motion between both groups post treatment in favor to group A. Conclusion: Both high velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation and muscle energy technique have significant short term effect on somatic dysfunctions in mechanical low back pain patients. However, high velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation is more effective in decreasing pain perception and increasing side bending and rotation range of motion
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aHigh velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation
653		4	_aMechanical low back pain
653		4	_aSomatic dysfunction
700	0		_aAhmed Salah Eldin Hassan , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohamed Hussien Elgendy , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aRania Nagy Karkousha , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c66150 _d66150