000			03200cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032013.0
008			180604s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.09.06.M.Sc.2017.Na.P
100	0		_aNada Mohammad Salem Mohammad
245	1	0	_aPatient{u2019}s contentment and accuracy of transferring orthodontic attachments between two indirect bonding techniques : _ba randomized controlled trial / _cNada Mohammad Salem Mohammad ; Supervised Mohamed Amgad Kaddah , Mona Mohamed Salah Fayed , Fady Hussein Fahim
246	1	5	_aمدى رضا المريض و دقة نقل الملحقات التقويمية باستخدام طريقتي لصق غير مباشر : _bدراسة سريرية عشوائية
260			_aCairo : _bNada Mohammad Salem Mohammad , _c2017
300			_a87 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520			_aAim of the study: To compare the two used methods of indirect bonding regarding the patient{u2019}s satisfaction during the bonding procedure. To compare the accuracy of transferring orthodontic attachments in all three planes of space by two indirect bonding widely used techniques, using means of 3 dimensional (3D) scanning and superimposition ,and to record the failure rate of the orthodontic tubes of posterior teeth over a four months period. Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed, 21 subject with fully erupted upper and lower first and second permanent molars showing no signs of enamel defects or signs of gingival inflammation were recruited in this study. 168 attachments were bonded to first and second molar teeth. A questionnaire was given to each subject to measure their satisfaction towards the used indirect bonding trays. After placement of molar tubes on the working model, the model was scanned with a desktop scanner, and the preoperative STL model was saved, a Vinyl polysiloxane VPS tray and a soft vacuum-formed tray were fabricated, one on each half of the working model, then the tubes were transferred to the patient{u2019}s dentition, a secondary impression was then made and poured, and the post-transfer model was then scanned with the same desktop scanner and the post-transfer STL model was saved. By using the Geomagic qualify version 12, the 2 STL models were superimposed and the deviations were detected for 3 linear measurements (mesio-disal, occluso-gingival, bucco-lingual) and 3 angular measurements (tip, torque, rotation). The debonded tubes were recorded for a follow up duration of 4 months
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aAccuracy of transferring orthodontic
653		4	_aTwo indirect bonding techniques
653		4	_aVPS
700	0		_aFady Hussein Fahim, _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohamed Amgad Kaddah , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMona Mohamed Salah Fayed , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c66472 _d66472