| 000 | 03522cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032015.0 | ||
| 008 | 180609s2016 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.13.M.Sc.2016.No.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aNour Eldeen Mohammed Ahmed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparison between immediate & delayed implant placement following splitting and grafting by (HA) for atrophic anterior maxilla : _bClinical & radiographic study / _cNour Eldeen Mohammed Ahmed ; Supervised Layla Mostafa Omara , Hesham Elsayed Elhawary |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aمقارنة الغرسات السنية الفورية بالمتأخرة بعد عمل الشق العظمي بالجزء الامامي من الفك العلوي الضامر وتطعيمة بالمواد الحيوية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bNour Eldeen Mohammed Ahmed , _c2016 |
||
| 300 |
_a89 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | ||
| 520 | _a6Aim of the study: The purpose of this study was to compare the survival rate of immediate & delayed placement of dental implants, following narrow maxillary ridge splitting & grafting by an alloplastic material. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 6 patients using 16 implants. The patients were divided randomly into 2 groups, Group I patients: eight sites were subjected to maxillary ridge splitting(anterior region), ridge grafting with Hydroxyapatite and delayed placement of total number of eight implants while group II patients: Eight sites were subjected to maxillary ridge splitting, ridge grafting with Hydroxyapatite followed by immediate placement of total number of eight implants. Preoperative, immediate (one week), 3 months and 6 months post-expansion and insertion CBCT radiographs assessed for measuring the bucco-lingually width. Results: During the follow up period, all patients showed no post-operative complications, Wound healing was uneventful in all patients, without any signs of wound dehesince or infection, All implants inserted were stable, which was detected by the periotest. The CBCT radiograph showed proper contact between bone and implant,also showed increase buccolingual width for both groups immediately post-operative and decrease in the width 6 months post-expansion and insertion. The gained results denoted that there was statistically significant increase in alveolar ridge width after one week, followed by statistically insignificant increase after 3 months, while, after 6 months in group II patients there was statistically insignificant decrease in the alveolar ridge. Whereas, group I patients had shown statistically significant increase in alveolar ridge width after one week, followed by insignificant decrease after 3 months followed by statistically insignificant decrease after 6 months.The net change (preoperative-6 months) of alveolar ridge width in control group was statistically significantly lower than that of the study group | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aAatrophic anterior maxilla | |
| 653 | 4 | _aDelayed implant | |
| 653 | 4 | _aImmediate | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aHesham Elsayed Elhawary , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aLayla Mostafa Omara , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c66518 _d66518 |
||