| 000 | 03567cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032015.0 | ||
| 008 | 180611s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.08.M.Sc.2017.Gh.E | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aGhada Gamal Hassan Adayil | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvaluation of osseous regeneration using camel versus bovine bone xenograft in experimental maxillary sinus floor augmentation : _bA histological comparative study in rabbits / _cGhada Gamal Hassan Adayil ; Supervised Manal Mohamed Hosny , Dalia Yehia Ahmed Zaki , Mai Zakaria Ibrahium Mohammed |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتقييم التجدد العظمي باستخدام العظام المستمدة من الجمال مقارنة بالعظام المستمدة من الابقارفى زيادة قاع الجيوب الأنفية التجريبي : _bدراسة مقارنة نسيجية في الأرانب |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bGhada Gamal Hassan Adayil , _c2017 |
||
| 300 |
_a116 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology | ||
| 520 | _aBone grafting procedures will remain one of the most challenging procedures in dentistry. Many trials using different types of bone grafts and techniques were developed with the hope of getting maximum results. The aim of present study is to evaluate the osseous regenerative capacity of newly developed bone xenograft derived from camel and to compare it versus bovine bone xenograft in experimental maxillary sinus floor augmentation in rabbits. Twelve healthy male White New Zealand rabbits were used in this experiment. Bilateral maxillary sinus floor elevation were prepared and augmented with: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (sites= 12) and deproteinized camelline bone mineral (DCBM) (sites= 12). Group 1 (n=6), rabbits were sacrificed after 4 weeks, and group 2 (n=6) were sacrificed after 8 weeks. Histological and histomorphometric were performed. Mean area percentages of the region of interest were calculated for; new mineralized tissue, residual graft particles and soft tissue. There was no statistically significant difference between DBBM (16.00±5.3)and DCBM (17.3±8.5)after one month in terms of % area of newly formed bone. The % area of newly formed bone at basal zone was higher for DCBM (26.48 ±7.72), at middle zone was higher for DBBM (13.00 ±1.26)and newly formed bone was comparable for 2 groups at the distal zone. Again, there was no statistically significant difference between DBBM (19.9 ±4.9) and DCBM 19.65±8.5)after two months in terms of % area of newly formed bone. The % area of newly formed bone at basal zone was higher for DCBM (29.95±12.9), at middle and distal zones was higher for DBBM. In conclusion, bone regeneration as assessed by area % of newly formed bone did not differ between Bio-Oss® and camelline bone in the basal, middle or distal zones of the augmented sinuses after 4 or 8 weeks in the present study | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aBone xenograft | |
| 653 | 4 | _aDeproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) | |
| 653 | 4 | _aSinus floor augmentation | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aDalia Yehia Ahmed Zaki , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMai Zakaria Ibrahium Mohammed , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aManal Mohamed Hosny , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c66534 _d66534 |
||