000 03275cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032015.0
008 180611s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Al.I
100 0 _aAli Abdulghani Abdelkader Alsourori
245 1 0 _aImpact of single implant versus two implants mandibular retained overdenture on denture retention and implant success rate in completely edentulous patients :
_bA randomized controlled clinical trial /
_cAli Abdulghani Abdelkader Alsourori ; Supervised Amal Fathy Kaddah , Ahmed Emad Aldin Fayyad
246 1 5 _aتاثير الاطقم السفلية المدعمة بزرعة واحدة مقابل الاطقم السفلية المدعمة بزرعتين على ثبات الطقم ومعدل نجاح الزرعة في مرضى الاطقم الكاملة :
_bدراسة سريرية عشوائية التحكم
260 _aCairo :
_bAli Abdulghani Abdelkader Alsourori ,
_c2017
300 _a197 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
520 _aThis randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the impact of single versus two-implant mandibular overdenture on the denture retention and success rates of completely edentulous patients. This trial was accomplished following recommendations made in the CONSORT statement for reporting randomized clinical trials. The population of this study consisted of twenty-four patients selected from the outpatient clinic of the Prosthodontic Department Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University. All patients were completely edentulous patients with ability to provide informed consent; age ranged from 40 to 70 years, free of systemic disease and from any oral pathological lesions in the oral cavity without history of bruxism, clenching, and not taking medical treatment that could affect osseointegration. The patients have been randomly assigned into two groups: - Intervention group: Twelve-patients, each patient received single midline implant mandibular overdentures. - Control group: twelve-patients, each patient received two-implant mandibular overdentures. Implants were placed in canine areas. For both group the opposing maxillary arch restored with conventional complete denture. Digital force meter was used to measure the retention of implant overdentures at baseline, thee, six, and 12 months after loading periods. Digital peri-apical radiograph with Digora software used to measure marginal bone loss at baseline, three, six, and 12 months after loading periods. Plaque and gingival indices were evaluated using plastic periodontal probe at baseline, three, six, and 12 months after loading periods
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aDenture retention
653 4 _aImpact of single implant
653 4 _aTwo implants mandibular
700 0 _aAhmed Emad Aldin Fayyad ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAmal Fathy Kaddah ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c66540
_d66540