000 03461cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032032.0
008 180815s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2017.Na.E
100 0 _aNada Mohamed Elmissery
245 1 0 _aEffect of high intensity laser on cubital tunnel syndrome /
_cNada Mohamed Elmissery ; Supervised Maher A. Elkeblawy , Mohamed Ahmed Elshaikh , Ghada Ismail
246 1 5 _aتاثير الليزر عالي الشدة على متلازمة النفق المرفقي
260 _aCairo :
_bNada Mohamed Elmissery ,
_c2017
300 _a99 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520 _aBackground: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. whether conservative or surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome is most effective is still much debated. An important component of conservative treatment is physiotherapy , which aims to promote physical and psychological health for the patient. purpose of the study : the purpose of the current study was to find out the effectiveness of high intensity laser on pain intensity level and ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity across the elbow in cubital tunnel syndrome . Subjects and methods : thirty patients (18 females and 12 males)their age ranged from 20 to 40 years suffering from mild to moderate unilateral cubital tunnel syndrome were conducted in the present study. They were assigned randomly into two equal studies groups. Group A consisted of 15 patients (9 females and 6 males) with mean age and body mass index (BMI) values of 28.06±2.28 years and 23.26±0.40 kg/m2 respectively. Group B consisted of 15 patients (9 females and 6 males) with mean age and BMI values of 28.4±3.20 years and 23.11±0.44 kg/m2 respectively . Study group: group A received high intensity laser while control group: group B recieved placebo high intensity laser , 5 times\ week for 4 weeks . Both groups were received same regular medical treatment. They were assessed using visual analogue scale for pain intensity level and nerve conduction studies for ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity. The assessment was performed twice for every subject (pre and post program). Results: statistical interpretation of both groups showed significant improvement , but in case of study group(G,A) the amount of improvement was higher in reduction of pain intensity level and increase in ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity across the elbow when compared with control group(G,B)with a p value 0.0001 in group A. Conclusion : High Intensity laser represents a significant effective therapy modality on suppression of pain intensity level and increase in ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity across the elbow
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aCubital Tunnel Syndrome
653 4 _aHigh Intensity laser
653 4 _aNerve Conduction Studies
700 0 _aGhada Ismail ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMaher A. Elkeblawy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohamed Ahmed Elshaikh ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c67081
_d67081