000 03114cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032034.0
008 180826s2017 ua f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.17.03.M.Sc.2017.Am.C
100 0 _aAmany Abdelghany Sadek Elbealy
245 1 0 _aCost-benefit analysis of an accredited faculty from different perspectives :
_bStudents, alumni, faculty staff, empolyees and stakeholders /
_cAmany Abdelghany Sadek Elbealy ; Supervised Fatma Ahmed Abed , Eglal Ahmed Abdelwahab
246 1 5 _aتحليل التكلفة والمنفعة لكلية معتمدة من وجهات نظر مختلفة :
_bالطلاب: الخريجين: هيئة التدريس: العاملين والمستفيدين من الخدمة
260 _aCairo :
_bAmany Abdelghany Sadek Elbealy ,
_c2017
300 _a103 , 12 Leaves ;
_c30cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Nursing - Department of Nursing Services Administration
520 _aBackground: accreditation process is lengthy, costly (direct/indirect) and some institutions need several years to achieve this status to obtain its benefits (the benefits should be outweighing the costs). Aim: The aim of the current study is to assess cost-benefit outcome of an accredited faculty from different perspectives: Students, Alumni, Faculty Staff, Employees, and Stakeholders. Design: A descriptive design was utilized to achieve the stated aim of current study. Setting: the study was conducted at Faculty of Nursing-Cairo University and Cairo University Hospitals in areas of nursing intern{u2019}s clinical practice. Sample: A stratified random sample for students (n= 308) was used, while convenient samples were used for alumni (n= 66), faculty staff (n=109), faculty employees (n= 37) and Stakeholders (n= 40). Tool: data was collected by using Noeman, Harmina & Elsaied (2015) questionnaire to assess cost-benefit of an accredited faculty. Results: the current study revealed that the students (65.7%), faculty staff (69.8%), employees (66.7%) and stakeholders (78.6%) views the highest benefit of accredited faculty as 2Improve status, prestige, and reputation3, while alumni (68.3%) viewed its benefits improve human and non-human resources. Besides, both faculty staff (80.5%) and employees (75.7%) perceived the cost of accreditation as high cost. conclusion: the most important benefits perceived by study participants were improve status, prestige, and reputation and improve human and non-human resources, while indirect cost was highly perceived cost. Recommendations: the faculty of nursing should be maintained the accreditation status
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAccreditation
653 4 _aCosts-benefits analysis
653 4 _aStudents
700 0 _aEglal Ahmed Abdelwahab ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aFatma Ahmed Abed ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c67152
_d67152