000			02985cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032105.0
008			181024s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.02.M.Sc.2018.La.I
100	0		_aLamia Mohammed Fahmy Ali
245	1	0	_aInterval aerobic exercise versus cupping therapy on essential hypertension in women / _cLamia Mohammed Fahmy Ali ; Supervised Azza Abdelaziz , Shereen Hamed , Wael Aboushokka
246	1	5	_aالتمارين الهوائية متقطعة الشدة مقابل كاسات الهواء في علاج مرضى ضغط الدم الأساسي لدى السيدات
260			_aCairo : _bLamia Mohammed Fahmy Ali , _c2018
300			_a95 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorders
520			_aThe purpose: to compare the effect of interval aerobic exercise versus cupping therapy on essential hypertensive women Subject and methods:Thirty hypertensive women patients their age between(30:40) years old. They were diagnosed with specialized physician as stage I essential hypertension (140:160mmHg Systole), (90:100mmHg Diastole).Subjects were recruited from internal medicine out-patient clinic at Internal Medicine Department at Ain Shams General Hospital and in Al Safwa outpatient clinic.The study started from January 2014 to December 2016. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group (A) fifteen hypertensive women received aerobic intervalexercise 15:20 min for session three times per week for a month, Group (B) fifteen hypertensive women received one cupping therapy session (20 Minutes) on six points in the neck and back at the beginning of a study month . Results:There was significant reduction of systolic blood pressureat post treatment in compare to pre-treatment and this mean there was improvement of systolic blood pressure in group (A):13.79%. and group (B):11.5 %., In spite of there was no statistical significant difference between group (A) and group (B), there was clinical difference and high improvement in favor to group (A). There was improvement of diastolic blood pressure in group (A):11.96 %and group (B):13.19%.In spite of there was no statistical significant difference between group (A) and group (B), there was clinical difference and high percent of improvement in favor to group B
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aCupping therapy
653		4	_aEssential hypertension
653		4	_aInterval aerobic exercise
700	0		_aAzza Abdelaziz , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aShereen Hamed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aWael Aboushokka , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c68144 _d68144