| 000 | 02828cam a2200325 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032139.0 | ||
| 008 | 181226s2018 ua d f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.A | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.02.12.M.A.2018.Do.E | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aDoaa Mahmoud Elsayed Sayed Atia | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe effect of L1 and L2 glossing on incidental vocabulary learning / _cDoaa Mahmoud Elsayed Sayed Atia ; Supervised Salwa A. Kamel |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aتأثير المعانى باللغة العربية والإنجليزية على التعلم العرضي لمفردات اللغة |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bDoaa Mahmoud Elsayed Sayed Atia , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a108 P. : _bcharts ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.A.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Arts - Department of English | ||
| 520 | _aThe aim of the study is to compare the effect of L1 (Arabic) glosses to the effect of L2 (English) glosses on L2 word form incidental immediate and delayed meaning recall of Egyptian learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), with concern given to the recall of the semantic and morphological components of L2 word forms. The participants were 68 intermediate-level Egyptians enrolled in a language center; they were divided into L1 glossing group and L2 glossing group. Each group had one reading session including a text followed by reading comprehension questions and an L1 meaning provision vocabulary test; the vocabulary test was repeated after two weeks. The data was analyzed quantitatively using the t-test and two- proportions test. The results showed that L1 glosses resulted in better immediate meaning recall of L2 word forms. However, no significant difference was found between the effect of the two glossing languages on either the delayed meaning recall of L2 word forms, the immediate and delayed meaning recall of synonyms, polysemes, and the whole set of associations, whether the morphological knowledge was considered or not; or on the immediate and delayed recall of precise and hypernym meanings, when the morphological knowledge was considered; nevertheless, when it was not considered, a significant difference was found between the effect of the two glossing languages on the immediate and delayed recall of the precise and hypernym meanings, but no difference was found concerning the immediate and delayed recall of hyponym meanings | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aIncidental vocabulary learning, glosses and L2 vocabulary learning | |
| 653 | 4 | _aL1 and L2 glosses | |
| 653 | 4 | _aSemantic and morphological components | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aSalwa A. Kamel , _esupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c69272 _d69272 |
||