000 | 02890cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
005 | 20250223032144.0 | ||
008 | 190105s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aPh.D | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.13.Ph.D.2017.Mo.E | ||
100 | 0 | _aMona Samy Mohammed Elhadidy | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvaluation of the vertical ridge augmentation using palatal versus buccal approaches for maxillary sandwich osteotomy in treatment of insufficient ridge height at the maxillary anterior region : _bRnddomized clinical trial / _cMona Samy Mohammed Elhadidy ; Supervised Ibrahim Shindy , Ahmed Barakat , Adel Abouelfetouh |
246 | 1 | 5 | _aتقييم زيادة النتوء الأفقي باستخدام النهج لشدقي مقابل النهج الحنكي في شطر العظم الفكي لعلاج نقص ارتفاع التنوء بمنطقة الفك الأمامي العلوي |
260 |
_aCairo : _bMona Samy Mohammed Elhadidy , _c2017 |
||
300 |
_a89 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | ||
520 | _aObjectives: The aim of this paper is to compare between the buccal approach versus the palatal approach in augmenting the vertical height of the anterior maxilla. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients were selected and divided randomly into two equal groups; study and control groups. Study group underwent palatal approach while the control group underwent buccal one. Both showed segmental osteotomy for the bone of the anterior maxilla and insertion of alloplastic bone block as grafting material. Four months later the bone gain was measured and compared and implanr insertion was done. The implant primary stability was measured using Osstell. Results: There was no statistically no significant difference between the two groups regarding the percentage of vertical bone height gained after 4 months and there was statistically no significant difference between the two groups regarding implant stability. Conclusion: Segmental sandwich osteotomy technique is an effective technique for augmentation of the anterior maxilla. Within the limitation of our study, the palatal approach has no prevalence over the buccal one regarding the labial prominence or the vertical height.The grafted alveolar ridge provided adequate primary implant stability | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aAnterior maxilla | |
653 | 4 | _aSandwich osteotomy | |
653 | 4 | _aSegmental osteotomy | |
700 | 0 |
_aAdel Abouelfetouh , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Barakat , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aIbrahim Shindy , _eSupervisor |
|
856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c69429 _d69429 |