000			02261cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032217.0
008			190225s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.11.31.M.Sc.2018.Ne.C
100	0		_aNehal Saleh Ahmed Shoukry Ismail
245	1	0	_aComparison between the role of colonoscopy and CT virtual colonography in diagnosis of colorectal diseases / _cNehal Saleh Ahmed Shoukry ; Supervised Lamiaa Ibrahim Abdelrahman , Ahmed Ali Gomaa Alshaal , Marwa Shaker Abdelfattah
246	1	5	_aمقارنة بين دور المنظارالشرجى و المنظار الشرجى الأفتراضى بواسطة الأشعة المقطعية فى تشخيص أمراض القولون و المستقيم
260			_aCairo : _bNehal Saleh Ahmed Shoukry Ismail , _c2018
300			_a98 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-diagnosis
520			_aColonoscopy is the standard modality for investigating lower GIT lesions. CTC is an alternative and less invasive modality. The aim of our study is to compare CTC and conventional colonoscopy results and to evaluate the accuracy of CTC for detecting colorectal lesions. This was documented by histopathology for all cases. Results; regardless of the size, CTC displayed 100% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity for detecting both colorectal polyps and masses, 0% sensitivity and100% specificity for ulcers and telangiectasia and 33.3% sensitivity and100% specificity for piles. We concluded that, CTC is a good alternative test compared to other colorectal cancer screening modalities because of its high sensitivity values in detecting masses and polyps >0.5 cm
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aColonoscopy
653		4	_aColorectal cancer
653		4	_aCT colonography
700	0		_aAhmed Ali Gomaa Alshaal , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aLamiaa Ibrahim Abdelrahman , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMarwa Shaker Abdelfattah , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c70513 _d70513