000 03036cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032220.0
008 190304s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.10.M.Sc.2017.Wa.E
100 0 _aWalaa Mostafa Baya
245 1 0 _aEffect of two surface treatments on the fracture resistance and shear bond strength of resin bon /
_cWalaa Mostafa Baya ; Supervised Taheya Ahmed Moussa , Sayed Hussein Saniour , Dalia Ahmed Saba
246 1 5 _aتأثير طريقتين من المعالجة السطحية على مقاومة الكسر وقوة الرابط لمواد جمالية مختلفة مصنعة آليا ملتصقين بلاصق راتنجية اسمنتي
260 _aCairo :
_bWalaa Mostafa Baya ,
_c2017
300 _a84 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Dental Materials
520 _aDevelopment of restorative materials that combine the advantages of ceramics and composite resins would enhance the properties and longevity of indirect esthetic restorations.Recently, novel CAD/CAM restorative materials for indirect restorations have been developed, based on polymer-infiltrated ceramic network materials (PICN).This study was designed to evaluate the effect of two surface treatments on the fracture resistance, micro-shear bond strengths and the surface morphological features of two indirect esthetic restorative materials to resin cements.Two commercially available ceramic blocks were used in this study; lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max) and hybrid ceramic blocks (VITA ENAMIC)For fracture resistance measurement; 20 ceramic inlays were fabricated using CEREC 3 InLab MC XL,and divided into two main groups according to type of the material; lithium disilicate glass ceramic inlays (IPS e.max) and hybrid ceramic (VITA ENAMIC). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to surface treatment; hydrofluoric acid etch and aluminum oxide sandblasting. The inlays were silanized and cemented to epoxy resin dies using adhesive resin cement; Rely X unicem. After that, the inlays were subjected to static loading till fracture using universal testing machine with a load cell of 5 KN.The load was applied occlusally at the centre pit area and directed parallel to the long axes of the epoxy dies. Load was increased gradually and applied at rate of 0.5 mm/min till failure occurs.The load at failure was recorded as fracture load (Newton)
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aCAD/CAM
653 4 _aResin bon
653 4 _aShear bond strength
700 0 _aDalia Ahmed Saba ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aSayed Hussein Saniour ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aTaheya Ahmed Moussa ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c70636
_d70636