000 02906cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032258.0
008 190509s2018 ua h f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.06.M.Sc.2018.He.E
100 0 _aHeba Elsayed Kamel Akl
245 1 4 _aThe effect of two different force magnitudes on maxillary posterior segment intrusion in adult patients with skeletal open bite using temporary anchorage devices :
_bA randomized clinical trial /
_cHeba Elsayed Kamel Akl ; Supervised Amr Mohamed Abouelezz , Fouad Aly Elsharaby , Amr Ragab Elbeialy
246 1 5 _aتأثير قوتين مختلفتين على إغراس الشق الخلفي من الفك العلوي للمرضي البالغين ذوي العضة العظمية المفتوحة باستخدام أجهزة الإرساء المؤقتة :
_bعينة سريرية عشوائية
260 _aCairo :
_bHeba Elsayed Kamel Akl ,
_c2018
300 _a263 P. :
_bfacsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520 _aObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different force magnitudes on maxillary posterior segment intrusion in treatment of adult subjects with skeletal open bite. Materials and methods: Twenty patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic at the Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. Segmented levelling and alignment was done for the maxillary posterior segments bilaterally till reaching 19*25 stainless steel arch-wire. Two infra-zygomatic and two palatal mini-screws were inserted for each patient, a full head cone beam computed tomographic image (CBCT) was taken. Intrusion was then initiated by means of nickel titanium closed coil springs, using 200 and 400g of force for the comparator and the intervention groups respectively. After a duration of 6 months, a second CBCT was taken for the evaluation of the intrusion phase. Results: There was statistically significant results for posterior teeth intrusion in both the comparator and the intervention groups, with no difference between the two, with significant anterior open bite closure. There was also insignificant tipping of posterior teeth during the intrusion phase for both groups with no difference between both groups
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAdult patients
653 4 _aMaxillary posterior segment intrusion
653 4 _aTwo different force magnitudes
700 0 _aAmr Mohamed Abouelezz ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAmr Ragab Elbeialy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aFouad Aly Elsharaby ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aAsmaa
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c71892
_d71892