000 02796cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032258.0
008 190509s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.11.31.M.Sc.2018.Na.A
100 0 _aNancy Osama Abdelhamid
245 1 4 _aThe additive role of contrast enhanced spectral mammography in women with risk of developing breast cancer /
_cNancy Osama Abdelhamid ; Supervised Rasha Mohamed Kamal Eldin , Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam , Heba Abdulhalim Khafagy
246 1 5 _aالدور الأضافى لأشعه الماموجرام بالصبغة فى السيدات المعرضات للأصابة بسرطان الثدى
260 _aCairo :
_bNancy Osama Abdelhamid ,
_c2018
300 _a111 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-diagnosis
520 _aAim of the work: To assess the additive role of contrast enhanced spectral mammography in women with risk of developing breast cancer. Patients and methods: the study included 283 eligible female patients with increased risk of developing breast cancer (i.e. positive family history of breast cancer of first degree relative, personal history of breast cancer and heterogeneously dense mammary parenchyma ), full field digital mammography (FFDM) and contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) were performed, the findings were evaluated independently on both mammography and CESM scanning and final BI-RADS classifications was given in each modality and compared to histopathology results as the golden standard. Results: In total, 283women were enrolled in the study, the mean age of this study population is 48 years. Among the studied cases regardless to a specific risk factor, 15/283(5.3%) cases were diagnosed as normal, 13/283 (4.6%) cases were diagnosed as inflammatory lesions, 72/283(25.4%) cases were diagnosed as benign lesions, 6/283(2.1%) cases were diagnosed as benign precancerous lesions, and 177/283(62.5%) cases were diagnosed as malignant. The overall sensitivity of the CESM was ( 92.7 %) in this study in comparison to mammographic sensitivity (80.90%)while the specificity was (71.43 %) and (59.05 %)respectively
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aBIRADS classifications
653 4 _aContrast enhanced spectral mammography
653 4 _aFull Field digital mammography
700 0 _aHeba Abdulhalim Khafagy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aLamiaa Mohamed Bassam ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aRasha Mohamed Kamal Eldin ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c71894
_d71894