000 | 02817cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
005 | 20250223032318.0 | ||
008 | 190620s2019 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.21.03.M.Sc.2019.Ah.C | ||
100 | 0 | _aAhmed Rageh Saber Ali | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparitive study among three physical therapy programs of shoulder impingment syndrome in body building athelets / _cAhmed Rageh Saber Ali ; Supervised Nadia Abdelazeem Fayaz , Ebtessam Fawzy Gomaa , Ahmad Hamdi Azzam |
246 | 1 | 5 | _aدراسة مقارنة بين ثلاثة برامج علاج طبيعي في متلازمة انحشار الكتف عند رياضى كمال الأجسام |
260 |
_aCairo : _bAhmed Rageh Saber Ali , _c2019 |
||
300 |
_a79 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders | ||
520 | _aBackground: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common cause of shoulder pain. Weight training places shoulder in unfavorable positions such as end-range external rotation while under heavy loads, creating joint and muscle imbalances and predisposing the shoulder to injury. Porpuse: this study was to evaluate differences amoung three physical therapy programs in treatment of impingment syndrome in bodybuilding players. Subjectes and methods:45 patients (25-40 years old) with impengiment syndrome selected from athletes participating in practice body-building. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups (15 patients in each group).Outcoms: posterior capsule tightness (PCT), glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), dyskinesis (type2) and rotator cuff strength were assessed using Hand held dynamometer, goniometer and tape measurement before and after 4 weeks of treatment. Result : There was a statistical significant difference between the three groups post one month of intervention in external rotator strenrngth (P=0.034), lower trapezius strength (P=0.005) and scapular load test (dayskinesis) (P=0.214). the diffrences was to the favor of group C .Although all groups had a significal improvemrnt post treatment in all other measured parameters ,but there was no statistical significal diffrenceses between the three groups (P>0.05) | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aBody building | |
653 | 4 | _aPhysical therapy | |
653 | 4 | _aShoulder impengiment syndrome | |
700 | 0 |
_aAhmad Hamdi Azzam , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aEbtessam Fawzy Gomaa , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aNadia Abdelazeem Fayaz , _eSupervisor |
|
856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
905 |
_aRania _eCataloger |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c72517 _d72517 |