| 000 | 02805cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032326.0 | ||
| 008 | 190713s2018 ua do f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2018.Ma.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMahmoud Sabry Ahmed Asal | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aContralateral versus ipsilateral neural mobilization ofmedian nerve in patients with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome / _cMahmoud Sabry Ahmed Asal ; Supervised Mohamed Hussein Elgendy , Olfat Ibrahim Ali , Amira Ahmed Aly Labib |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aالتحريك العصبي للعصب الأوسط للجانب المقابل مقابل نفس الجانب في مرضي متلازمة النفق الرسغي أحادي الجانب |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMahmoud Sabry Ahmed Asal , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a82 P. : _bcharts , photoghraphs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science | ||
| 520 | _aBackground: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common neuropathy caused by entrapment of the median nerve at the level of the wrist. Neural mobilization is one of the frequently used methods for treating CTS.Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of contralateral and ipsilateral neural mobilization of median nerve in cases of unilateral (CTS).Methods: forty five patients of both genders with ages ranged from 30-50 years old were diagnosed as unilateral mild to moderate CTS. They randomly assigned into three groups, each one included 15 patients, all groups received conventional treatment in form of TENS, U.S and infra-red. The first group received contralateral neural mobilization in form of upper limb tension test 1 (ULTT-1) plus conventional treatment, the second group received ipsilateral neural mobilization in the form of (ULTT-1) plus conventional treatment and the third group received only conventional treatment. All groups received 3 treatment sessions per week for 2 weeks. Computerized electromyography was used for measuring median nerve motor and sensory distal latencies before and after the treatment. Pain level and Functional level were measured by Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) respectively | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aCarpal tunnel syndrome | |
| 653 | 4 | _aContralateral neural mobilization. | |
| 653 | 4 | _aNeural mobilization | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAmira Ahmed Aly Labib , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Hussein Elgendy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aOlfat Ibrahim Ali , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c72793 _d72793 |
||