000			02814cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032408.0
008			190928s2019 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.08.M.Sc.2019.Mo.E
100	0		_aMona Adel Abdeltwab Farag
245	1	0	_aEffect of manual therapy with task oriented training on hand function in stroke patients : _bA randomized controlled study / _cMona Adel Abdeltwab Farag ; Supervised Abeer Abobakr Elwishy , Hanan Helmy Mohamed Elgendy
246	1	5	_aتأثير العلاج اليدوي مع التدريب الموجه نحو المهمة على وظيفة اليد في مرضى السكتة الدماغية
260			_aCairo : _bMona Adel Abdeltwab Farag , _c2019
300			_a119 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photoghraphs ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and Neurosurgery
520			_aBackground: Proper hand function is essential for everyday life activities. However, post stroke, muscle contracture and joint stiffness develop as a common consequence of immobility in hand. Objective: This study was conducted to determine the effect of adding mobilization to task oriented training on hand function in chronic stroke patients. Methods: Thirty chronic stroke patients participated in this study and were randomly divided into two equal groups; study group, which received joints mobilization followed by task oriented training for the affected hand and control group, which received task oriented training for the affected hand. Both groups received treatment three times per week for a period of six weeks. All patients were evaluated before and after therapy. The primary outcome measures were hand function that was assessed by Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and active and passive wrist extension range of motion that was measured by a standard goniometer.The secondary outcome measure was grip strength that was assessed by a JAMAR Adjustable Hand Dynamometer. Results: The results of this study showed that post treatment; both groups showed a significant improvement in all outcome measures compared with pre treatment. However, there was a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding all the outcome measures in favor to the study group
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aHand function
653		4	_aMobilization
653		4	_aStroke
700	0		_aAbeer Abobakr Elwishy , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aHanan Helmy Mohamed Elgendy , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c74215 _d74215