| 000 | 02711cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032412.0 | ||
| 008 | 191008s2018 ua d f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2018.Wa.S | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aWael Aly Sayed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aStress distribution analysis of two types of denture base materials (rigid and resilient) in implant supported overdenture using magnetic attachment : _b3 D finite elements study / _cWael Aly Sayed ; Supervised Hamdy Aboalfotoh , Mostafa Helmy |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتقييم توزيع الجهد باستخدام الأكريل الصلب على الأطقم المحمولة المدعمة بغرسات الأسنان مقارنة بالأكريل المرن : _bدراسة تحليل العناصر المحدودة ثلاثية الأبعاد |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bWael Aly Sayed , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a118 P. : _bcharts ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontic | ||
| 520 | _aThe implant supported overdenture for complete edentulous patients become more satisfied for patients in retention, phonetics and mastication when compare to conventional denture . The literature regard the more occlusal force transmitted to implants and surrounding structure lead to bone resorption (Kim et al. 2004b; Wang et al. 2017). The aim of this study compare between different types of denture base materials that help in decrease bone resorption and less overdenture maintenance , the amount of force using by finite element analysis . When compare between forces application vertically on mesial first molar and distal of second premolar area by forced 50N, 100N.150N and oblique 100 N the (worst scenario) , in both conventional acrylic resin and flexi resin acrylic both in physiological limit of bone . Within limitation of study following conclusion can be derived : 1)Cortical bone showed similar outcome in both denture base materials. 2)Cancellous bone behavior showed no effect of denture base material on its stresses or deformations . 3)Rigid denture base material generated higher stresses on magnetic attachment by about 10% than using the resilient one | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aDenture base materials (Rigid and Resilient) | |
| 653 | 4 | _aImplant supported overdenture | |
| 653 | 4 | _aMagnetic attachmen | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aHamdy Aboalfotoh , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMostafa Helmy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aAsmaa _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c74338 _d74338 |
||