000			03022cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032421.0
008			191021s2019 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.11.15.Ph.D.2019.Na.U
100	0		_aNada Hossam Aldin Ahmed Mohamed
245	1	0	_aUltrasonography and serum estradiol / progesterone ratio as predictors of pregnancy rate after ICSI/ET cycles / _cNada Hossam Aldin Ahmed Mohamed ; Supervised Ayman Abdalhalim Marzouk , Dalia Samir Thu Alfakkar , Hisham Mamdouh Haggag
246	1	5	_aالموجات الصوتية و نسبة الإستراديول على البروجستيرون كمنبئات لمعدل الحمل بعد دورات الحقن المجهرى و نقل الأجنة
260			_aCairo : _bNada Hossam Aldin Ahmed Mohamed , _c2019
300			_a120 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
520			_aObjective: To determine whether or not endometrial thickness, echogenic pattern and E2/P ratio measured on the day of embryo transfer can serve as reliable predictors of treatment outcome following ICST/ET cycles. Methods: A total of 367 infertile women undergoing embryo transfer after ICSI cycles were studied in a prospective study. Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration and on the day of ET and of endometrial echo-pattern, E2/P ratio on the day of embryo transfer, hormonal profile (Day 3 FSH, LH and E2), and various other variables (age, BMI, number of oocytes retrieved per patient, fertilization rate, number and quality of embryos) were evaluated. These variables were compared among the clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy and non-pregnant groups. Also, their influence on implantation rate was examined. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the measured endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration (10.67±2.25, 10.59±2.18, 10.56±2.22, p=0.5) and that measured on the day of embryo transfer among the three groups. The distribution of patients with type A endometrium among the clinical pregnancy Vs the chemical pregnancy group (p=0.9) and that among the clinical pregnancy group Vs the non-pregnant group (p=0.14) was statistically insignificant. The E2/P ratio was calculated and compared among the three groups, however the difference was statistically insignificant (78.08±85.27, 51.86±44.81, 110.57±274.49, p=0.65)
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aEcho-pattern
653		4	_aEndometrial thickness
653		4	_aEstradiol
700	0		_aAyman Abdalhalim Marzouk , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aDalia Samir Thu Alfakkar , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aHisham Mamdouh Haggag , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c74661 _d74661