000 02867cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032435.0
008 191111s2019 ua do f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2019.Mo.S
100 0 _aMohammed Nabil Ibrahim Fiaad
245 1 0 _aSpinal manipulation versus mulligan mobilization in low back dysfunction /
_cMohammed Nabil Ibrahim Fiaad ; Supervised Wadida H. Elsayed , Aly M. Elzawahry , Mary Kamal Nassif Takla
246 1 5 _aتحريك الفقرات مقابل التحريك بتقنية موليجان فى الخلل الوظيفى المزمن لأسفل الظهر
260 _aCairo :
_bMohammed Nabil Ibrahim Fiaad ,
_c2019
300 _a104 P. :
_bcharts , photoghraphs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Sciences
520 _aBackground: Low back dysfunction (LBD) is the most common complaint of the working age population, in addition to human suffering; it causes an economic burden due to the use of medical services and absence from work. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Spinal Manipulation with Mulligan lumbar mobilization on pain intensity level, functional impairment, and spinal mobility in patients with chronic LBD. Subjects: Forty five patients (24 male and 21 female) were diagnosed with chronic LBD, aged from 25 to 40 years. Method: Subjects were randomly divided into three groups (fifteen patients each); group A (control group) received conventional physical therapy program included Infrared and strength exercises for back and abdominal muscles. Group B received conventional physical therapy program and Spinal Manipulation technique. Group C received conventional physical therapy program and Mulligan lumbar mobilization technique. The treatment was applied three days/week for four weeks. Pain intensity level, Functional impairment and Lumbar flexion ROM was measured by Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability scale and Inclinometer respectively. Measurements were taken at two intervals pre-treatment and post-treatment. Results: There were statistical differences among the three groups, where group B showed greater improvement in pain intensity level, functional impairment, and spinal mobility than other two groups
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aLow back dysfunction
653 4 _aMobilization with movement technique
653 4 _aSpinal manipulation
700 0 _aAly M. Elzawahry ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMary Kamal Nassif Takla ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aWadida H. Elsayed ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c75121
_d75121