000 02964cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032436.0
008 191113s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.09.06.Ph.D.2018.Mo.A
100 0 _aMohamed Abdelrahim Abuelazayem
245 1 0 _aAssessment of low level laser therapy on rate of the maxillary incisor intrusion in treatment of adult patients with gummy smile :
_bA randomized clinical study /
_cMohamed Abdelrahim Abuelazayem ; Supervised Mohamed Abdelalim Boushnaq , Fouad A. Elsharaby , Eman Mohie Eldin Elsayed , Mostafa A. Abdelrahman
246 1 5 _aتاثير العلاج بالليزر منخفض المستوى على معدل انغراس القواطع العلوية فى علاج مرضى بالغين لديهم ابتسامة لثوية :
_bتجربة سريرية عشوائية
260 _aCairo :
_bMohamed Abdelrahim Abuelazayem ,
_c2018
300 _a193 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520 _aObjective: The current study was a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) that was performed to evaluate the effect of low level laser therapy on the rate of maxillary incisor intrusion in adult patients having deep bite associated with gummy smile. Materials and Methods: 24 patients having gummy smile associated with deep bite were enrolled in the study (mean age of 20.4 years). Patients were randomly allocated to one of two intervention groups. Both groups received fixed orthodontic treatment with preadjusted edgewise brackets, segmented levelling and alignment was carried out in upper arch until 17 X 25 STST-inch wire. Additionally, two miniscrew implants (MSI) were inserted between the maxillary lateral incisor and canines, then a total intrusive force of 100 grams was applied and checked with force gauge. 2Group A3 received LLLT during intrusion while 2Group B3 was the comparator with no LLLT application. LLLT was applied on day of force application, then days 7, 14, 21,28,42,56 and continued for 2 weeks till the end of follow up period (6 months). Results: The monthly rate of intrusion showed no statistically or clinically significant difference between both groups through the different follow up months with mean rates of 0.7 mm/month and 0.66 mm/month for laser and non-laser groups respectively
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aGummy smile
653 4 _aLow level laser therapy
653 4 _aThe maxillary incisor intrusion
700 0 _aFouad A. Elsharaby ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohamed Abdelalim Boushnaq ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMostafa A. Abdelrahman ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c75165
_d75165