000 03334cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032509.0
008 200101s2019 ua do f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.06.M.Sc.2019.Za.S
100 0 _aZainab Abdulrhman Mohammed
245 1 0 _aSatisfaction of adult patients with gummy smile treated by botulinum toxin A injection versus modified lip repositioning surgery :
_bA randomized clinical trial /
_cZainab Abdulrhman Mohammed ; Supervised Mohammed Abdalalim Bushnak , Manal Foda , Dalia Alboghdadi
246 1 5 _aرضا المرضى البالغين ذوى الابتسامه اللثويه المعالجين بحقن توكسين البوتولينوم النوع أ مقارنه بالجراحه المعدله لاعاده تموضع الشفه :
_bدراسه سريريه عشوائيه
260 _aCairo :
_bZainab Abdulrhman Mohammed ,
_c2019
300 _a134 P. :
_bcharts , photographs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520 _aObjectives: This randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess the extent of patient's satisfaction and measure the degree of improvement in gingival display using BTX-A injection in comparison with modified surgical lip repositioning . Materials And Methods : Twenty patients with an age range of 18-35 years which included both males and females were enrolled in this study. and they were divided into two groups:Group I " the intervention group" : patients were treated by botox injection. Group II " the comparator group" : patients were treated by modified lip repositioning surgery. Patients included in the study had excessive gingival display more than 3 mm during smiling , hypermobile upper lip with or without (mild / moderate) vertical maxillary excess , normal morphology of clinical crowns , normal lip separation (ILG) at rest and were medically free . Subjects were recorded to acquire digital videographic film during full smile allowing the clinician to capture the best videoframe represents a patient{u2019}s nonposed smile. The smile images were then uploaded on OrisCeph Rx3 computer software , by which , soft tissue measurements were done , including gingival display and other parameters of lower facial esthetics like Upper lip length , Vermilion border width and interlabial gap upon smiling. Both botox injection and modified lip repositioning were applied to subjects according to the grouping generated previously. VAS ( Visual Analogue Scale ) from 0 to 10 was used to score patient's satisfaction . Posttreatment records were taken at 4,8,12 and 24 weeks in a time line taken 6 months. posttreatment records were taken at 4,8,12 and 24 weeks in a time line taken 6 months
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aBotulinum toxin A injection
653 4 _aGummy smile treated
653 4 _aModified lip repositioning surgery
700 0 _aDalia Alboghdadi ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aManal Foda ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohammed Abdalalim Bushnak ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aAsmaa
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c76192
_d76192