000			02219cam a2200313 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
008			200104s2019 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2019.Hi.E
100	0		_aHitham Mahmoud Abdelmonem Ibrahim Shalaby
245	1	0	_aEffect of using rigid versus non-rigid attachments on stresses induced in peri-implant bone in implant-supported prostheses : _bFinite element analysis : A non-randomized in-vitro study / _cHitham Mahmoud Abdelmonem Ibrahim Shalaby ; Supervised Hamdy Aboulfotouh Hamed , Nouran Abdelnaby
246	1	5	_aتأثير استخدام الروابط الصلبة مقارنة بالروابط المرنة على الأحمال المنقولة للأنسجة العظمية المحيطة بزرعات الأسنان فى التركيبات المحملة كلية على الزرعات : _bتحليل الأحمال بتقنية العناصر المحدودة
260			_aCairo : _bHitham Mahmoud Abdelmonem Ibrahim Shalaby , _c2019
300			_a134 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
520			_aBackground: Peri-implant bone forces can sometimes be very high. Efforts are made in order to lower these forces at normal level. Methods: A finite element analysis was done in which two models were compared, the rigid attachment used in a fixed prosthesis versus the nonrigid one used in a removable prosthesis. Both of them were completely implant-supported. Results: have shown that the rigid type produced higher stresses than the nonrigid one. Conclusion: Nonrigid attachments are more biocompatible than the rigid attachments
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aCompletely implant supported prostheses
653		4	_aFixed versus removable prostheses
653		4	_aRigid attachments versus non Rigid attachments
700	0		_aHamdy Aboulfotouh Hamed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNouran Abdelnaby , _eSupervisor
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c76205 _d76205