000 02871cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032513.0
008 200112s2019 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2019.Is.C
100 0 _aIslam Atef Mohamed Abdelrazik Kandil
245 1 0 _aClinical evaluation of the effect of low speed drilling versus conventional drilling technique on crestal bone level in maxilla :
_bA randomized controlled clinical trial /
_cIslam Atef Mohamed Abdelrazik Kandil ; Supervised Hani Mahmoud Essam Elnahass , Karim Mohamed Fawzy Elsayed
246 1 5 _aمستوى على التقليدية الحفر تقنية مقابل الحفر سرعة انخفاض للتأثير السريرى التقييم العلوى الفك فى القشرى العظم
260 _aCairo :
_bIslam Atef Mohamed Abdelrazik Kandil ,
_c2019
300 _a108 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
520 _aAim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of low versus conventional speed drilling regarding the amount of crestal bone loss, bone density values, implant survival, implant stability, Visual Analogue Scale score and patients{u2019} satisfaction over 6 months follow up, following implant placement in maxillary edentulous ridge. Materials and methods: The present study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on 12 patients to evaluate the amount of crestal bone loss , density values, implant survival ,implant stability ,VAS score and patient satisfaction over 6 months follow up, following implant placement in maxillary edentulous ridge at low speed drilling without irrigation versus conventional drilling speed technique.Classical implant placement without any bone augmentation was the technique used in both groups. All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically for 6 months. Radiographic evaluation involved digital radiograph immediately after implant insertion, three months and six months postoperatively to evaluate crestal bone loss and bone density changes. Resonance frequency analysis to measure implant stability using Osstell device was performed immediately after implant insertion, three months postoperative at time of implant exposure and six months postoperative
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aConventional speed drilling
653 4 _aDental implant
653 4 _aLow speed drilling
700 0 _aHani Mahmoud Essam Elnahass ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aKarim Mohamed Fawzy Elsayed ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c76301
_d76301