| 000 | 02896cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032517.0 | ||
| 008 | 200121s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2018.Mo.E | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMohamed Ahmed Abdelhameed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvaluation of patient satisfaction and microbiological changes in injectable thermoplastic resin and conventional acrylic resin complete dentures : _bA randomized clinical trial / _cMohamed Ahmed Abdelhameed ; Supervised Amal Rekaby Taha , Azza Farahat Metwally , Reham Dewdar |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aتقييم رضاء المرضى والتغيرات الميكروبيولوجية لطقم كامل مصنوع من الاكريليك الحرارى القابل للحقن مقارنة الأكريليك التقليدى |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMohamed Ahmed Abdelhameed , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a118 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
| 520 | _aObjectives: The present study was conducted to compare between the polyamide thermoplastic resin and polymethyl methacrylate resin with respect to the patient satisfaction as a primary outcome and candidal adherence as a secondary outcome. Subjects and methods: In this randomized clinical trial, forty-eight completely edentulous patients were randomly classified into two groups of twenty-four patients each. Group (I) had received a complete denture made from a polyamide thermoplastic material complete denture. Group (II) had received complete denture made from polymethyl methacrylate. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire and candidal count was evaluated by collection of swabs cultured on Sabouraud{u2019}s agar gel plates. Results: There was no significant difference in mean Satisfaction between Group I and Group II at insertion or 1 month periods (p >0.05), However, there was a significant difference in mean Satisfaction between Group I and Group II in 3 months and 6 months periods (p < 0.05). The previously mentioned results revealed that there was no significant difference in mean CFU between Group I and Group II at insertion or 1 month or 3 months period (p >0.05) except in 6 months period where there was a significant difference in mean CFU between Group I and Group II (p < 0.05) | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aCandidal count | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPatient satisfaction | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPolyamide thermoplastic materia | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAmal Rekaby Taha , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aAzza Farahat Metwally , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aReham Dewdar , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c76425 _d76425 |
||