000			02981cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032604.0
008			200926s2020 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2020.Al.E
100	0		_aAliaa Mohamed Ali Elabd
245	1	0	_aEffect of cervical posture correction and lumbar stabilization exerciseson mechanical low back pain / _cAliaa Mohamed Ali Elabd ; Supervised Haytham Mohamed Elhafez , Ahmed Ibrahim Elerian , Salah Eldin Bassit
246	1	5	_aتأثير تمرينات تصحيح القوام العنقية وتمرينات الثبات القطنية على آلام أسفل الظهر الميكانيكية
260			_aCairo : _bAliaa Mohamed Ali Elabd , _c2020
300			_a152 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photoghrphs ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: Although current lumbar stabilization exercises are beneficial for mechanical low back pain, further research is recommended focusing on normalizing global sagittal spinal alignment. Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the effects of adding cervical posture correction to lumbar stabilization exercises on mechanical low back pain. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Fifty adult patients of both genders with chronic mechanical low back pain and forward head posture were assigned into one of two groups to receive three sessions/ week for 12 weeks treatment; group A: cervical posture correction and lumbar stabilization, and group B (control): lumbar stabilization. The primary outcome was back pain intensity level. Secondary outcomes included disability, craniovertebral angle, lumbopelvic alignment parameters (lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence), and sagittal lumbar intervertebral movements (translation and rotation). They were measured from lateral views X-ray. Reported data were analyzed by Two-ways-MANOVA. Results: MANOVA indicates significant effects. Pain, disability, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope were significantly reduced in group A more than B (p< 0.05). Craniovertebral angle and pelvic tilt were increased in A more than B (p< 0.05). However, pelvic incidence and all other intervertebral movements revealed no significant differences (p>0.05). Within-group-comparisons were significant for all variables in both groups except for pelvic incidence
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aLow back pain
653		4	_aPosture
653		4	_aStabilization
700	0		_aAhmed Ibrahim Elerian , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aHaytham Mohamed Elhafez , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSalah Eldin Bassit , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c77918 _d77918