000 03212cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032616.0
008 201019s2020 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.21.02.M.Sc.2020.Mo.I
100 0 _aMona Mahmoud Mohamed Abdelhady
245 1 0 _aInterfrential electrical stimulation versus pulsed electromagnetic field in management of intermittent claudication /
_cMona Mahmoud Mohamed Abdelhady ; Supervised Nesreen Gharib Elnahas , Mohamed Hamza Hamed , Nagy Louis Nassif
246 1 5 _aالتحفيز الكهربائى التداخلى مقابل الموجات الكهرومغناطيسية المتقطعة فى علاج العرج المتقطع
260 _aCairo :
_bMona Mahmoud Mohamed Abdelhady ,
_c2020
300 _a126 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiolmonary and Geriatrics and Disorders
520 _aAim: This study was conducted to compare between the therapeutic efficacyof Interfrential electrical stimulation versus pulsed electromagnetic field in management of intermittent claudication (IC).Subjects: Forty five patients of both sexes, participated in this study, were selected from out patients clinic of vascular department in Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. Their ages ranged from 50 to 60 years old. Methods: All patients were evaluated by Ankle Brachial pressure Index (ABPI), Graded Treadmill exercise testing to determine (ACD,PWT), Walking impairement questionnaire (WIQ). The patients were randomly assigned into three equal groups; group (A) 15 patients received 30 min of pulsed electromagnetic field for 8 weeks in addition to heel raise exercise and calf stretch exercise and their medical treatment, (B) 15 patients received 20 min of interfrential electrical stimulation for 8 weeks in addition to heel raise exercise and calf stretch exerciseand their medical treatment. (C) Control group: 15 patients received their medical treatment only. Results:results of this study showed that there were significant difference for all groups of the study in a favor of group (A) and the percentage of improvement was represented in values of each (55.94 % of ACD, 64.44 % of PWT, 3.9% of ABPI ,WIQ distance score 88.23%, 74.01 of speed score, 22.45 of symptoms impairement).Conclusion: On the basis of this study, it could be concluded that pulsed Electromagnetic field moreeffective than interfrential electrical stimulation in management of patients with intermittent claudicationand that is through improvingtheir walking efficiency and functional capacity
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aElectromagnetic field
653 4 _aInterfrential electrical stimulation
653 4 _aintermittent claudication
700 0 _aMohamed Hamza Hamed ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aNagy Louis Nassif ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aNesreen Gharib Elnahas ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c78314
_d78314