000			02169cam a2200325 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
008			201026s2020 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.11.15.M.Sc.2020.Ma.C
100	0		_aMaria Armia Helmy Hakeem
245	1	0	_aComparison between misoprostol, intracervical foley catheter and combined misoprostol-foley catheter in induction of labor : _bA randomised controlled trial / _cMaria Armia Helmy Hakeem ; Supervised Nadine Alaa Sherif , Hisham Mohamed Gouda , Sherif Sameh Zaki
246	1	5	_aمقارنة بين الميزوبروستول و قسطرة فولى داخل عنق الرحم و الميزوبروستول و قسطرة فولى مجتمعين لتحريض المخاض : _bدراسة عشوائية منضبطة
260			_aCairo : _bMaria Armia Helmy Hakeem , _c2020
300			_a89 P . : _bcharts , facsmilies ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
520			_aInduction of labor is a common obstetric procedure, and it is indicated when the benefits to either the mother or the fetus outweigh those of continuing the pregnancy. Cervical assessment (Bishop's score) at the time of initiation is the best independent predictor of induction success. The most commonly used methods are mechanical methods, prostaglandins and oxytocin. Indication for induction of labor, clinical presentation, safety, cost and patient preference may be used in selecting the method of induction.Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the combination of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labor
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aCervical ripening Misoprostol
653		4	_aFoley catheter
653		4	_aLabor induction
700	0		_aHisham Mohamed Gouda , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNadine Alaa Sherif , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSherif Sameh Zaki , _eSupervisor
905			_aAmira _eCataloger
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c78443 _d78443