000 03271cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032637.0
008 201129s2020 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.21.04.M.Sc.2020.Ay.E
100 0 _aAya Hamed Mohamed Abdelhamid
245 1 0 _aEffect of pulsed electromagnetic field versus aerobic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea /
_cAya Hamed Mohamed Abdelhamid ; Supervised Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Awad , Asmaa Mahmoud Elbandrawy , Amir Araby Gabr
246 1 5 _aتأثير المجال الكهرومغناطيسى المتقطع مقابل التمرينات الهوائية على مرض عسر الطمث الأولى
260 _aCairo :
_bAya Hamed Mohamed Abdelhamid ,
_c2020
300 _a87 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Gynecology and Obstetrics
520 _aBackground: Dysmenorrhea is the most common gynecologic complaint among adolescent and young adult females.Purpose : This study was conducted to compare between the effect of pulsed electromagnetic field and aerobic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea. Subjects: Forty girls diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea participated in this study.They were selected randomly from Kasre El Ainy University Hospital.They had regular menstrual cycle.Their ages were ranged from 16-25years. Their body mass index (BMI) was ranged from 20-25 Kg/m2. All of them were virgins. Girls with irregular or infrequent menstrual cycles, pacemaker, hyperthyroidism, pelvic pathology and BMI < 25 Kg/m2 or > 20 Kg /m2 were excluded from the study. Design: Design of this study was two group pre-test and post-test experimental design. Methods: They were divided into two equal groups: Group A consisted of twenty girls and treated by pulsed electromagnetic field on the pelvic region, 3 times per week for four weeks. Group B consisted of twenty girls and treated by aerobic exercise, 3 times per week for four weeks. Evaluation: Pain was evaluated by VAS, quality of life was assessed by short form survey (SF-12) and progesterone hormone was evaluated for both groups (A and B) before and after treatment. Results: Results found that; pre treatment, there was no significant difference between both groups (A and B) in progesterone hormone, VAS and quality of life. While post treatment, there was significant difference between both groups (A and B) in progesterone hormone (more increase in group A), VAS (more decrease in group A) and quality of life (more increase in group A). Conclusion: It can be concluded that pulsed electromagnetic field is more effective than aerobic exercise in treating primary dysmenorrhea
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAerobic exercise
653 4 _aPrimary dysmenorrhea
653 4 _aPulsed Electromagnetic Field
700 0 _aAmir Araby Gabr ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAsmaa Mahmoud Elbandrawy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohamed Ahmed Mohamed Awad ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c79006
_d79006