000 | 02882cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
005 | 20250223032639.0 | ||
008 | 201203s2020 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2020.Da.I | ||
100 | 0 | _aDalia Samir Mahmoud Shaker | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aInfluence of implant thread{u2019}s cross-sectional design on the micromotion of the implants in different bone qualities : _bFinite element analysis / _cDalia Samir Mahmoud Shaker ; Supervised Amr Hosny Elkhadem , Mohammed Atef Abdelrasoul |
246 | 1 | 5 |
_aطريقة تحليل العناصر الغير المحدودة : _bتأثير تصميم المقطع العرضى لسن لولب الغرسات على الحركات الدقيقة للغرسات فى العظام مختلفة الجودة |
260 |
_aCairo : _bDalia Samir Mahmoud Shaker , _c2020 |
||
300 |
_a119 P . : _bcharts , facsmilies ; _c25cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
520 | _aImplant micromotion can be one of the causes of implant failure. One of the factors affecting micromotion is the implant macrodesign, which includes the implant{u2019}s thread cross sectional design. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implant{u2019}s thread cross sectional design on the micromotion of the implants in different bone qualities. In this finite element analysis study, four implant models exhibiting four different thread designs (buttress, reverse buttress, v-shaped and square) were created using Solidworks software. Each model was assembled with a superstructure in four models of four different bone qualities resulting in 16 groups. Each group was examined for micromotion under 100N force using ANSYS software. The results revealed that when comparing micromotion in different bone qualities, the lowest micromotion values were observed with D1 bone and the highest values were observed with D4 bone regardless the thread design. When comparing different thread designs, in D1 and D2 bone, the lowest micromotion was observed with v-shaped thread, which was lower than the square thread and the buttress thread was lower than the reverse buttress thread. While in D3 and D4 bone, the lowest micromotion was observed with the square thread, which was lower than the v-shaped and the reverse buttress thread was lower than the buttress thread | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aFinite element analysis | |
653 | 4 | _aMicromotion | |
653 | 4 | _aThread design | |
700 | 0 |
_aAmr Hosny Elkhadem , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aMohammed Atef Abdelrasoul , _eSupervisor |
|
856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
905 |
_aAmira _eCataloger |
||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c79061 _d79061 |