000 03362cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032658.0
008 210124s2020 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.11.10.M.Sc.2020.Ma.L
100 0 _aMarina Mozeih Shaker Mikhail
245 1 0 _aLow level light therapy and fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of stria alba :
_bA randomized controlled study /
_cMarina Mozeih Shaker Mikhail ; Supervised Doaa Mahgoub , Vanessa Hafez
246 1 5 _aتجربة عشوائية منضبطة :
_bالعلاج بالضوء المنخفض المستوى و ليزر ثانى أكسيد الكربون الجزئى فى علاج علامات تمدد الجلد
260 _aCairo :
_bMarina Mozeih Shaker Mikhail ,
_c2020
300 _a112 P . :
_bcharts , facsmilies ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Dermatology and Venerology
520 _aBackground: Striae distensae are common dermatological complaint causing a psychological burden on affected patients. Various therapeutic agents have been tried but each has its own limitations. Fractional CO2 laser offers relatively best results among lasers. Photobiomodulation was reported to have healing properties, analgesic and anti-inflammatory, which all could be of benefit in treatment of stria alba or at least help as an adjuvant to fractional lasers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of low level light therapy using infra-red diode 808nm in the management of stria alba in comparison to fractional CO2 alone and combined both therapies. METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 30 patients were randomized equally to either fractional carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser, low level light therapy (LLLT), or combined. Fractional CO₂: 2 sessions were performed with onemonth interval. LLLT: 8-12 sessions, 2 sessions per week. Follow up at 1 and 3 months was done using physician{u2019}s and patient's global assessment of improvement and patient satisfaction score. Adverse events were evaluated both in term of occurrence (pain, erythema, edema, itching and peeling, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation) and duration in days.RESULTS: The efficacy of LLLT using Diode 808 nm is statistically comparable to that of fractional CO₂ laser, despite numerical superiority of the latter, as evidenced by the median patient global assessment of improvement, the median physician global assessment of improvement, and the patient satisfaction score at the end of study. The results of the combined group showed the least numerical values in all efficacy outcomes, and they all showed statistically significant difference with the fractional CO2 group, in favor of the latter [median patient global assessment of improvement, median physician global assessment of improvement, and median patient satisfaction]
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aFractional carbon dioxide laser
653 4 _aInfra-red diode 808 nm
653 4 _aLow level light therapy
700 0 _aDoaa Mahgoub ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aVanessa Hafez ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aAmira
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c79665
_d79665