000			02256cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032701.0
008			210131s2020 ua d f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.13.13.M.Sc.2020.Fa.C
100	0		_aFatma Abady Awade Abady
245	1	2	_aA comparative study : _bRisk management for banking construction and general construction projects in Egypt / _cFatma Abady Awade Abady ; Supervised Mohamed A. Shalaby , Ehab Abdel Atty Abdel Hafiz
246	1	5	_aدراسة مقارنة : _bإدارة المخاطر للمشروعات الإنشائية للبنوك والمشروعات الإنشائية العامة فى مصر
260			_aCairo : _bFatma Abady Awade Abady , _c2020
300			_a95 P . : _bcharts ; _c30cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Engineering - Department of Mechanical Design and Production
520			_aSummary: Risk management is a known as a three-stage process; risk identification, risk analysis, and risk actions. Therefore, this study is devoted to address the three-stages of risk management to both of General Construction and Banking Construction projects in Egypt. A Spearman Ranked Correlation test is applied to the two lists, and showed that risk factors for Banking is statistically different than those of the General Construction. A Design Structure Matrix (DSM) approach is used to identify the root risks among the overall top risks. A pool of risk actions is recommended, and their impact on the three project objectives are assessed by the multi criteria optimization method TOPSIS to choose the most effective few actions. The study key results present the top ranked risks for each for Banking and construction, their most effective actions, and compares such risks with internationally reported top risks
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aFuzzy
653		4	_aOPSIS
653		4	_aRisk
700	0		_aEhab Abdelatty Abdelhafiz , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohamed A. Shalaby , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aAmira _eCataloger
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c79768 _d79768