000 04153cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032746.0
008 210606s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.11.25.Ph.D.2021.Ma.C
100 0 _aMahmoud Mohammed Ahmed Attalah
245 1 2 _aA comparative study of iliotibial band tenodesis for extra-articular augmentation of ACL reconstruction using staple versus interference screw /
_cMahmoud Mohmmed Ahmed Attalah ; Supervised Ahmed Abdelaziz Ahmed , Amr Samir Rashwan , Ahmed Mahmoud Gad
246 1 5 _a{uFEA9}{uFEAD}{uFE8D}{uFEB3}{uFEEA} {uFE87}{uFEB3}{uFE98}{uFEA8}{uFEAA}{uFE8D}{uFEE1} {uFEA9}{uFE91}{uFE8E}{uFEB3}{uFEEA} {uFEE3}{uFED8}{uFE8E}{uFEAD}{uFEE7}{uFEEA} {uFE91}{uFEE4}{uFEB4}{uFEE4}{uFE8E}{uFEAD} {uFE97}{uFEAA}{uFE8D}{uFEA7}{uFEE0}ى {uئإؤ٣}ى {uئإ٩٧}{uئإ٩أ}{uئإ٩٢}{uئإئ٤}{uئإ٩٦} {uئإ٨٧}{uئإأآ}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإء٩}{uئإإ٩} {uئإ٩١}{uئإإ٨}{uئإ٨إ}ء {uئإ٨ؤ}{uئإؤئ}{uئإآ٨}{uئإءإ}{uئإئ٣}{uئإأ٢} {uئإ٨ؤ}{uئإؤئ}{uئإء٤}{uئإءإ}{uئإؤ٧}{uئإؤ٤}ى {uئإ٨ؤ}{uئإؤئ}{uئإأ٨}{uئإإ٨}{uئإ٩٢}{uئإإإ}{uئإ٩١}ى {uئإؤئ}{uئإءء}{uئإأآ}{uئإإ٢} {uئإء٧}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإءؤ}{uئإ٩ئ}ى {uئإؤ٣}ى {uئإ٨ؤ}{uئإؤئ}{uئإءإ}{uئإ٩١}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإأ١} {uئإ٨ؤ}{uئإؤئ}{uئإآأ}{uئإإ٠}{uئإئ٤}{uئإ٩٢}ى {uئإ٨ؤ}{uئإئآ}{uئإإ٣}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإإ٣}ى
260 _aCairo :
_bMahmoud Mohmmed Ahmed Attalah ,
_c2021
300 _a143 P. :
_bcharts , facimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedic Surgery
520 _aBackground: Rotational laxity has been demonstrated to persist, even in the face of a well-performed Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.The iliotibial band (ITB) has also been shown to have an impact on the control of anterolateral rotational laxity. In particular, recent research would suggest that the capsulo-osseous layer of the ITB, is a major contributor to anterolateral rotational control. Methods: From December 2018 to December 2020, a prospective randomized (simple randomization) analytical clinical study was done to compare the functional outcome of group of patients undergoing ITB for extra articular augmentation of ACL Reconstruction using staple versus group of patients using interference screw. Results: Upon comparing thepostoperative, the primary finding is there was significant improvement of pivot shift in both groups with (100 % grade A pivot shift) in group A and (85 % grade A pivot shift) and (15% grade B pivot shift) in group B. So, the primary finding in this study is significant rotational control. The secondary finding is there was statistically significantdifferencein the postoperative IKDC objective scorebetween the 2 groups (p= 0.004). The reason for that is the postoperative lateral sided pain over iliotibial band incisional scar, there was statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p= 0.001), in group A (60.0%) were graded as (A) and (40.0%) were graded as (C) but in group B (80.0%) were graded as (A) and (20.0%) were graded as (B). And so, after surgery, (35.0%) had removed staple in group (A) and (0.0%)patients had removed interference screw in group B. There was statistically high significant difference on comparing results in favor of postoperative results (p 0.008).Suggesting the use of interference screw rather than staple, when the same point of fixation of ITB tenodesis as described in the technique was used
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
653 4 _aExtra-articular
653 4 _aIliotidial Dand (ITB)
700 0 _aAhmed Abdelaziz Ahmed ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAhmed Mahmoud Gad ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAmr Samir Rashwan ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c81193
_d81193