000			03120cam a2200325 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
008			210801s2021 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.02.M.Sc.2021.Ha.V
100	0		_aHadeer Kamal Abdelazim Husssein
245	1	0	_aVentilatory function response to upper versus lower limbs aerobic training inelderly men / _cHadeer Kamal Abdelazim Husssein ; Supervised Azza Abdelaziz Abdelhady , Youssef Mohamed Amin , Marwa Mahmoud Elsayed
246	1	5	_aاستجابة الوظائف التنفسية لتدريب الأطراف العلوية الهوائية مقابل تدريب الاطراف السفلية لدى الرجال كبار السن
260			_aCairo : _bHadeer Kamal Abdelazim Husssein , _c2021
300			_a70 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiomonary Geriatrics Disorders
520			_aBackground: Ventilatory function and aerobic capacity each decline by {u223C}40%, with aging leading to ventilatory limitation ,dyspnea, exercise intolerance, which affected by performance of upper and lower limbs, so it is important in the elderly to use aerobic training to improve ventilatory function, by training upper limbs as well as lower limbs which not investigated previously. Aim of the study: To compare between the impact of upper versus lower limbs training on ventilatory function in elderly men. Methods: Eligible 40 elderly men their age ranged from (60-65) years old, body mass index (BMI) ranged from 25to34.9 kg /m2 participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Cairo University, Egypt.Patients were divided into two groups equal in number; the group (A) performed upper limbs training by arm ergometer, while the group (B) performed lower limbs training by cycle ergometer for three times per a week for 12 weeks. Ventilatory function included (Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow rate(PEFR), and peak expiratory flow25-75%(PEF25-75%) were evaluated pre and post intervention for 12 weeks (36 sessions). Results: after 12 weeks of intervention, both groups demonstrated significant increase of FEV1, FVC, and PEFR (p< 0.05)in group A and group B respectively (23.56%,22.96%,29.36%) and (27.75%,25.37%,73.49%) by contrast there was no significant difference was observed in the mean of FEV1/FVC ratio and PEF25-75% between pre and post-intervention (p>0.05) in both groups A and B respectively(1.05%, 5.51%) and (9.07%, 13.39%)
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aArm ergometer
653		4	_aElderly men
653		4	_aVentilatory function
700	0		_aAzza Abdelaziz Abdelhady , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMarwa Mahmoud Elsayed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aYoussef Mohamed Amin , _eSupervisor
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c81546 _d81546