000			03076cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032805.0
008			210823s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.Em.D
100	0		_aEman Mohamed Fahmy Mohamed
245	1	0	_aDeep neck flexor stabilizer biofeedback exercise versus integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on chronic mechanical neck pain / _cEman Mohamed Fahmy Mohamed ; Supervised Ragia Mohamed Kamel , Amira Hussin Draz , Ghada Ismail Mohamed
246	1	5	_aتمرين وحده تثبيت التغذية الراجعه البيولوجيه لعضلات الثنى العنقيه العميقه ضد تقنية التثبيط العضلى العصبى المتكامل على آلام الرقبه المزمنه
260			_aCairo : _bEman Mohamed Fahmy Mohamed , _c2021
300			_a105 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: The muscular imbalance between the neck muscles and specifically between the deep and superficial neck flexors is considered the main contributing factor in chronic neck pain Objective: This study was conducted to compare between effect of deep cervical flexor pressure biofeedback exercise to effect of Integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique in treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain. Method: Forty-five patients (34 females ,11 males), with age average (27.47 ±3.29) years with Chronic mechanical neck pain randomly assigned into 3 equal groups (all n=15),Group (A): received Deep cervical flexor pressure biofeedback exercise plus traditional program, Group (B): Integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique plus traditional program and Group (C) only traditional program (Infrared, Ultrasonic, and massage) for three weeks, three sessions per week.The outcomes measured by inclinometer for cervical range of motion assessment in six directions, visual analogue scale for pain and neck pain disability index for functional disability, before and after treatment. Results: within group analysis revealed significant difference in range of motion, pain and neck pain disability index before and after the treatment in the three groups as p {u02C2} 0.05, and between group analysis revealed significant difference of range of motion, pain after treatment in favor to group A, as p {u02C2} 0.05while no significant difference between group A, B in NDI _as P>0.05
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aDeep cervical flexor
653		4	_aIntegrated neuromuscular inhibition technique
653		4	_aPressure biofeedback exercise
700	0		_aAmira Hussin Draz , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aGhada Ismail Mohamed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aRagia Mohamed Kamel , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c81818 _d81818